Literature DB >> 12589754

Annotating nucleic acid-binding function based on protein structure.

Eric W Stawiski1, Lydia M Gregoret, Yael Mandel-Gutfreund.   

Abstract

Many of the targets of structural genomics will be proteins with little or no structural similarity to those currently in the database. Therefore, novel function prediction methods that do not rely on sequence or fold similarity to other known proteins are needed. We present an automated approach to predict nucleic-acid-binding (NA-binding) proteins, specifically DNA-binding proteins. The method is based on characterizing the structural and sequence properties of large, positively charged electrostatic patches on DNA-binding protein surfaces, which typically coincide with the DNA-binding-sites. Using an ensemble of features extracted from these electrostatic patches, we predict DNA-binding proteins with high accuracy. We show that our method does not rely on sequence or structure homology and is capable of predicting proteins of novel-binding motifs and protein structures solved in an unbound state. Our method can also distinguish NA-binding proteins from other proteins that have similar, large positive electrostatic patches on their surfaces, but that do not bind nucleic acids.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12589754     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00031-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  78 in total

1.  From protein structure to biochemical function?

Authors:  Roman A Laskowski; James D Watson; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

2.  Using electrostatic potentials to predict DNA-binding sites on DNA-binding proteins.

Authors:  Susan Jones; Hugh P Shanahan; Helen M Berman; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Target selection and determination of function in structural genomics.

Authors:  James D Watson; Annabel E Todd; James Bray; Roman A Laskowski; Aled Edwards; Andrzej Joachimiak; Christine A Orengo; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.885

4.  Qgrid: clustering tool for detecting charged and hydrophobic regions in proteins.

Authors:  Shandar Ahmad; Akinori Sarai
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Identifying DNA-binding proteins using structural motifs and the electrostatic potential.

Authors:  Hugh P Shanahan; Mario A Garcia; Susan Jones; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Structure-based prediction of DNA-binding proteins by structural alignment and a volume-fraction corrected DFIRE-based energy function.

Authors:  Huiying Zhao; Yuedong Yang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Frustration in protein-DNA binding influences conformational switching and target search kinetics.

Authors:  Amir Marcovitz; Yaakov Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structural bioinformatics prediction of membrane-binding proteins.

Authors:  Nitin Bhardwaj; Robert V Stahelin; Robert E Langlois; Wonhwa Cho; Hui Lu
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Residue-level prediction of DNA-binding sites and its application on DNA-binding protein predictions.

Authors:  Nitin Bhardwaj; Hui Lu
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Identification of DNA-binding proteins using structural, electrostatic and evolutionary features.

Authors:  Guy Nimrod; András Szilágyi; Christina Leslie; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.