Literature DB >> 12589689

Early photoperiod history and short-day responsiveness in Siberian hamsters.

Sharry L Goldman1, Bruce D Goldman.   

Abstract

Siberian hamsters exhibit seasonal, photoperiod influenced cycles of reproductive activity, body size, pelage characteristics, and thermoregulatory behavior. Laboratory populations generally exhibit inter-individual variability in expression of photoperiod responsiveness, with a subset of individuals that fail to show the species typical responses to short photoperiod. This variability is partly explained by a genetic component, as it has been possible to increase the number of short-day nonresponders by artificial selection. Responsiveness to short photoperiod is also substantially influenced by photoperiod history in this species; hamsters that have been raised under long (16L) or very long (18L) day lengths are less likely to exhibit winter-type responses to short days as compared to hamsters raised under an intermediate (14L) day length. In the present experiment, we examined effects of age and early photoperiod history in a strain of Siberian hamsters that had been selected for short-day nonresponsiveness. Hamsters transferred into short photoperiod on the day of birth were uniform in exhibiting winter-type responses. However, hamsters raised until 25 days of age in either continuous illumination or in 16L exhibited variation in responsiveness when subsequently moved into short photoperiod. We conclude that virtually all hamsters of the short-day nonresponsive strain are born responsive to short days. Subsequent development of resistance to potential short day effects is dependent on age and/or photoperiod history. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12589689     DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.10202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol        ISSN: 1548-8969


  6 in total

1.  Dim nighttime illumination alters photoperiodic responses of hamsters through the intergeniculate leaflet and other photic pathways.

Authors:  J A Evans; S N Carter; D A Freeman; M R Gorman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  In synch but not in step: Circadian clock circuits regulating plasticity in daily rhythms.

Authors:  J A Evans; M R Gorman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Individual differences in circadian waveform of Siberian hamsters under multiple lighting conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer A Evans; Jeffrey A Elliott; Michael R Gorman
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.182

4.  Photoperiod-induced differences in uterine growth in Phodopus sungorus are evident at an early age when serum estradiol and uterine estrogen receptor levels are not different.

Authors:  Adrien N Phalen; Ron Wexler; Jenifer Cruickshank; Sung-Un Park; Ned J Place
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.320

5.  Dim nocturnal illumination alters coupling of circadian pacemakers in Siberian hamsters, Phodopus sungorus.

Authors:  M R Gorman; J A Elliott
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Polymorphism of winter phenotype in Siberian hamster: consecutive litters do not differ in photoresponsiveness but prolonged acclimation to long photoperiod inhibits winter molt.

Authors:  Anna S Przybylska-Piech; Michał S Wojciechowski; Małgorzata Jefimow
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.