Literature DB >> 12588325

Individualized T cell monitored administration of ATG versus OKT3 in steroid-resistant kidney graft rejection.

Karsten Midtvedt1, Per Fauchald, Bjoern Lien, Anders Hartmann, Dagfinn Albrechtsen, Birgitte L Bjerkely, Torbjoern Leivestad, Inge B Brekke.   

Abstract

Acute steroid-resistant rejection episodes are recommended to be treated with set doses of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3). Individualized T cell monitoring has been proposed as a tool for dose finding. A randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of ATG (n = 27) with OKT3 (n = 28) in the treatment of biopsy verified acute steroid-resistant rejection (ASRR) when both drugs were administered on the basis of daily individualized T cell measurements. A drop to below 50 cells/mm3 CD2+ T cells was considered adequate and used to guide the dose of ATG/OKT3. Demographic, clinical and histopathological severities of rejections were equal in the two groups. During the 10 days of T cell monitoring and antibody treatment, 13 patients were in need of dialysis (ATG = 7/OKT3 = 6). Two grafts did not respond to antibody treatment and were lost due to rejection (ATG = 1/OKT3 = 1). There were 26 biopsy verified re-rejections (ATG = 12/OKT3 = 14) within the first 3 months following antibody treatment. Mean serum creatinine (micromol/L) was similar in the two groups (ATG/OKT3: before rejection 157 +/- 72/151 +/- 88, at start of antibody treatment 308 +/- 125/330 +/- 94, end of antibody treatment 254 +/- 122/246 +/- 144 and at follow-up after a mean of 32 months 166 +/- 55 (n = 24)/164 +/- 57(n = 23)). To keep the T cell count below 50 cells/mm3, average dose ATG given was 354 +/- 151 mg (2.3 administrations, range 1-4) and average OKT3 was 32.5 +/- 6.8 mg in 10 doses. In conclusion, individualized T cell monitored administration of ATG and OKT3 is safe and seems as effective as a standard set dose in treatment of ASRR. Tailoring the dose for each individual patient lowers the cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12588325     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2003.02105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current landscape for T-cell targeting in autoimmunity and transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel R Getts; Sushma Shankar; Emily M L Chastain; Aaron Martin; Meghann Teague Getts; Kathryn Wood; Stephen D Miller
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 2.  Overview of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Anjana A Pillai; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sanjiv Saigal; Rajat Shukla; Hardik Kotecha; Neeraj Saraf; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-03

4.  Managing transplant rejection in the elderly: the benefits of less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens.

Authors:  Kristian Heldal; Karsten Midtvedt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TOL101, a murine IgM anti-human αβ T cell receptor antibody, in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Daniel R Getts; William G Kramer; Alexander C Wiseman; Stuart M Flechner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Risk factors associated with post-kidney transplant malignancies: an article from the Cancer-Kidney International Network.

Authors:  Ben Sprangers; Vinay Nair; Vincent Launay-Vacher; Leonardo V Riella; Kenar D Jhaveri
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-10-27

Review 7.  Understanding the Significance and Implications of Antibody Numbering and Antigen-Binding Surface/Residue Definition.

Authors:  Mathieu Dondelinger; Patrice Filée; Eric Sauvage; Birgit Quinting; Serge Muyldermans; Moreno Galleni; Marylène S Vandevenne
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Case Report: Pure Red Cell Aplasia Caused by Refractory Parvovirus B19 Infection After Pancreas Transplantation Alone.

Authors:  Jørn Petter Lindahl; Regine Barlinn; Ingerid Weum Abrahamsen; Signe Spetalen; Karsten Midtvedt; Trond Jenssen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-16

9.  Cumulative Doses of T-Cell Depleting Antibody and Cancer Risk after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Jenny H C Chen; Germaine Wong; Jeremy R Chapman; Wai H Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.