Literature DB >> 12588220

A prospective evaluation of the incidence of complications associated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

Jonathan L Cook1, Jennifer B Perone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because outpatient surgery is being increasingly scrutinized in the lay press, it is important that dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons accurately characterize the safety of office-based surgery. Although there is abundant anecdotal evidence to support the inherent safety of dermatologic surgery, there are few data that support the safety of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) as performed by appropriately trained dermatologic surgeons in outpatient settings.
DESIGN: All patients presenting for MMS micrographic surgery during the calendar year 2000 were prospectively enrolled in this study designed to evaluate the incidence of multiple complications associated with scalpel-based cutaneous surgery (postoperative hemorrhage, hematoma formation, wound infection, wound dehiscence, and flap/graft necrosis).
SETTING: An academic MMS practice. PATIENTS: A total of ,1052 patients (1,358 MMS cases) were prospectively enrolled. Complete follow-up information was available for 1,343 cases (98.9%).
RESULTS: Complications associated with MMS were very infrequent, with an overall complication incidence of 1.64% (22/1,343). Most surgical complications involved difficulties with hemostasis. No complications were significant enough to involve the assistance of another specialist or to require the hospitalization of the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Mohs micrographic surgery is a very safe outpatient procedure when performed by appropriately trained physicians. The types of complications seen in our patients were identical to those seen in hospitalized patients described in previous studies. Our complication rates were equal to or lower than the published complication rates from specialists in other surgical disciplines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12588220     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.139.2.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  16 in total

1.  Video education provides effective wound care instruction pre- or post-mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Monica M Van Acker; Mark A Kuriata
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-04

2.  Process of Post-operative Telephone Follow-up Implementation for Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Brayden Forbes; Aaron M Secrest; Matthew Q Hand; Mark J Eliason
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2018-07-01

3.  Pseudoaneurysm as a Post-Biopsy Complication.

Authors:  Geo Han; Jung Woo Lee; Seung Hwi Kwon; Jiehyun Jeon; Hae Jun Song; Chil Hwan Oh; Sang Il Suh; Soo Hong Seo
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 4.  Hemorrhagic complications in dermatologic surgery.

Authors:  Christopher G Bunick; Sumaira Z Aasi
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 5.  Mohs micrographic surgery versus surgical excision for periocular basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Narayanan; Omar H Hadid; Eric A Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-12

6.  Retrospective Clinical Trial of Fusidic Acid versus Petrolatum in the Postprocedure Care of Clean Dermatologic Procedures.

Authors:  Dong Hun Lee; Dong Young Kim; So Young Yoon; Hyun Sun Park; Hyun-Sun Yoon; Soyun Cho
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  The characteristics of Mohs surgery performed by dermatologists who learned the procedure during residency training or through postgraduate courses and observational preceptorships.

Authors:  Howard K Steinman; Henry Clever; Anthony Dixon
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-04

8.  Postoperative Complications of Paramedian Forehead Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  Collin L Chen; Sam P Most; Gregory H Branham; Emily A Spataro
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  Association of Mohs Reconstructive Surgery Timing With Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Matthew Q Miller; Abel P David; James E McLean; Stephen S Park; Jared Christophel
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Predicting outcomes following second intent healing of periocular surgical defects.

Authors:  Nour Kibbi; Yulia Khan; David J Leffell; Sean R Christensen; Kathleen C Suozzi
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.