Literature DB >> 12587934

Clinical guidelines versus clinical practice in the management of low back pain.

M P Armstrong1, S McDonough, G D Baxter.   

Abstract

To date, there have been limited data on the implementation of evidenced-based clinical guidelines for low back pain (LBP). The aim of this study was to assess current management of LBP and evaluate to what extent clinical practice now reflects clinical guidelines. This survey involved the collection and analysis of data from the records of 200 patients who had been referred to a large teaching hospital with LBP Analysis indicated a high use of X-rays, with little evidence of initial biopsychosocial assessment. The most popular treatments were advice, active exercises and McKenzie therapy. Manipulation was rarely used. Overall, a low use of electrotherapy was recorded. The results emphasise how little the clinical guidelines have influenced the decisions of clinicians, and highlight the need to address the barriers to adopting an evidence-based approach in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12587934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  10 in total

Review 1.  Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.

Authors:  N Ann Scott; Carmen Moga; Christa Harstall
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment.

Authors:  Josep M Arnau; Antoni Vallano; Anna Lopez; Ferran Pellisé; Maria J Delgado; Nuria Prat
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Jl Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert Gatchel; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

4.  Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Côté; Marie-José Durand; Michel Tousignant; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-14

5.  Consumers' experiences of back pain in rural Western Australia: access to information and services, and self-management behaviours.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Helen Slater; Samantha Bunzli; Joanne E Jordan; Stephanie J Davies; Anne J Smith; John L Quintner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Individuals with chronic low back pain have greater difficulty in engaging in positive lifestyle behaviours than those without back pain: an assessment of health literacy.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Joanne E Jordan; Peter B O'Sullivan; Rachelle Buchbinder; Angus F Burnett; Richard H Osborne; Leon M Straker
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  What factors explain the number of physical therapy treatment sessions in patients referred with low back pain; a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Ilse C S Swinkels; Raymond H Wimmers; Peter P Groenewegen; Wil J H van den Bosch; Joost Dekker; Cornelia H M van den Ende
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Carmen Fernández; Antonio Cordero; Alfonso Muriel; Luis González-Luján; María Teresa Gil del Real
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Treatment of contained lumbar disc herniations using radiofrequency assisted micro-tubular decompression and nucleotomy: four year prospective study results.

Authors:  Stefan Hellinger
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

10.  Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua Zadro; Mary O'Keeffe; Christopher Maher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.