Literature DB >> 12587785

Maxillary sinus augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and Impladent dental implant system. Part II. Evaluation of deprotienized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and implant surface.

Samer Kasabah1, Antonín Simůnek, Jirí Krug, Miguel Cevallos Lecaro.   

Abstract

The objective of this clinical study was to determine the predictability of endosseous implant placed in a maxillary sinus augmented with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A total of 185 implants (109 titanium and 76 hydroxyapatite-coated) were placed in 77 patients representing 92 sinuses either a one- or two-stage surgical technique. A mixture of venous patient's blood and Bio-Oss was used alone within 20 sinuses (Group 1), or in combination with autogenous bone within 72 sinuses (Group 2). Thirty-nine implants were placed in Group 1 and 147 implants were inserted in Group 2. The grafted sinuses were evaluated clinically and radiographically at second stage surgery. According to certain criteria, of the implants placed, only two titanium implants (1.08%) failed with 98.91% implant survival. There was no statistically variable difference for the use of hydroxyapatite-coated or titanium implants. The two failed implants were from Group 2. No clinical benefit has been achieved from the combination with autogenous bone (P<0.05). All the grafted sinuses were sufficient to place dental implants of at least 12 mm length (100% graft success). The results of this short-term study support the hypothesis that Bio-Oss can be a suitable material for sinus augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12587785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove)        ISSN: 1211-4286


  4 in total

1.  Effects of fibrin-binding oligopeptide on osteopromotion in rabbit calvarial defects.

Authors:  Ju-A Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Chong-Pyoung Chung; Yoon-Jeong Park
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Palatal window osteotomy technique improves maxillary sinus augmentation in previously insufficient augmentation case.

Authors:  Daisuke Ueno; Takashi Kurokawa; Katsuichiro Maruo; Tsuneaki Watanabe; Jayanetti Asiri Jayawardena
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Different Biomaterials Used in Alveolar Cleft Defects in Children.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Silva Gomes Ferreira; Danila De Oliveira; Ciro Borges Duailibe De Deus; Roberta Okamoto
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

Review 4.  Is alveolar cleft reconstruction still controversial? (Review of literature).

Authors:  Sameh A Seifeldin
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2015-06-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.