Literature DB >> 12587001

Influence of undersampling on magnetic resonance imaging measurements of intra-abdominal adipose tissue.

E L Thomas1, J D Bell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Single-slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are finding increasing use as methods to estimate visceral fat content in human studies. To assess the validity of this approach, we have compared single- and multi-slice MRI methods for the measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue content. MEASUREMENTS: Multi-slice whole-body MR images and single-slices at the level of L2-L3 and L4-L5 were obtained from 59 healthy female volunteers chosen to cover a wide range of body size, and from 17 healthy female volunteers before and after a 6-month exercise intervention.
RESULTS: Taking the group as a whole, significant correlation between multi-slice and single-slices was observed (L2-L3: r=0.56; P<0.01; L4-L5: r=0.76; P<0.01). However, the ranking of subjects according to their intra-abdominal fat content was significantly altered by the choice of MRI strategy, especially using L2-L3 methodology. Whole-body (-23.8+/-20.0%; P<0.01) and single-slice (L2-L3: -31.03+/-35.0%; P<0.01; L4-L5: -22.1+/-37.24%; p<0.05) MRI methods also detected a significant decrease in intra-abdominal fat following the exercise protocol, although the latter techniques gave rise to increased spreading of the data from the mean. These results suggest that the use of single-slice imaging techniques can lead to inconsistencies in the estimation of intra-abdominal fat content, which in turn can have significant effects on data interpretation.
CONCLUSION: Single-slice MRI appears to be suitable for assessing changes in intra-abdominal fat content in interventional studies, especially in large cohort of subjects, where each subject can serve as its own control. However, for accurate determination of an individual's intra-abdominal fat content, and intersubject comparison, only multi-slice imaging will give precise results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12587001     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.802229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of 3 T MRI and CT for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in humans.

Authors:  B J Klopfenstein; M S Kim; C M Krisky; J Szumowski; W D Rooney; J Q Purnell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Quantitative comparison and evaluation of software packages for assessment of abdominal adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Bonekamp; P Ghosh; S Crawford; S F Solga; A Horska; F L Brancati; A M Diehl; S Smith; J M Clark
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Influence of motor complete spinal cord injury on visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue measured by multi-axial magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Kieren J Mather; Hunter J Poarch; David R Gater
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Anthropometer3D: Automatic Multi-Slice Segmentation Software for the Measurement of Anthropometric Parameters from CT of PET/CT.

Authors:  Pierre Decazes; David Tonnelet; Pierre Vera; Isabelle Gardin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  MRI adipose tissue and muscle composition analysis-a review of automation techniques.

Authors:  Magnus Borga
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Stress and abdominal fat: preliminary evidence of moderation by the cortisol awakening response in Hispanic peripubertal girls.

Authors:  Carrie J Donoho; Marc J Weigensberg; B Adar Emken; Ja-Wen Hsu; Donna Spruijt-Metz
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Single slice vs. volumetric MR assessment of visceral adipose tissue: reliability and validity among the overweight and obese.

Authors:  Greg Maislin; Murtuza M Ahmed; Nalaka Gooneratne; Matt Thorne-Fitzgerald; Christopher Kim; Karen Teff; Erna S Arnardottir; Bryndis Benediktsdottir; Hildur Einarsdottir; Sigurdur Juliusson; Allan I Pack; Thorarinn Gislason; Richard J Schwab
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Anthropometric predictors of visceral adiposity in normal-weight and obese adolescents.

Authors:  Dorit Koren; Carole L Marcus; Christopher Kim; Paul R Gallagher; Richard Schwab; Ruth M Bradford; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.866

9.  Novel relationships of age, visceral adiposity, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein concentrations to growth hormone (GH) releasing-hormone and GH releasing-peptide efficacies in men during experimental hypogonadal clamp.

Authors:  Johannes D Veldhuis; Daniel M Keenan; Joy N Bailey; Adebordurin M Adeniji; John M Miles; Cyril Y Bowers
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  Ellen W Demerath; Wei Shen; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; Stefan A Czerwinski; Roger M Siervogel; Bradford Towne
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.