BACKGROUND: The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child. METHODS: The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age +/- SD = 72.5 +/- 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power. RESULTS: After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p =.033) and C (p =.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p =.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power. CONCLUSIONS:Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The performance of daily tasks, such as stair climbing or lifting an object, requires both muscle strength and power. Age-associated reductions in strength and power can affect an older adult's ability to complete daily tasks such as stair climbing and lifting a child. METHODS: The purposes of this study were to determine whether power training was more efficacious than strength training for improving whole-body physical function in older adults and to examine the relationship between changes in anaerobic power and muscle strength and changes in physical function. Thirty-nine men and women (mean age +/- SD = 72.5 +/- 6.3 years) with below-average leg extensor power were randomly assigned to control (C, n = 15), strength-training (ST, n = 13) or power-training (PT, n = 11) groups. The ST and PT groups met 3 days per week for 16 weeks; the C group maintained usual activity and attended three lectures during the course of the study. Primary outcome measures included the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test, maximal strength, and anaerobic power. RESULTS: After baseline was controlled for, the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance test total score was significantly greater for the PT group than for the ST (p =.033) and C (p =.016) groups. Maximal strength was significantly greater for the ST group than for the C group (p =.015) after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups for peak anaerobic power. CONCLUSIONS: Power training was more effective than strength training for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults.
Authors: Pradeep Suri; Dan K Kiely; Suzanne G Leveille; Walter R Frontera; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: I G Fatouros; A Kambas; I Katrabasas; K Nikolaidis; A Chatzinikolaou; D Leontsini; K Taxildaris Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Kieran F Reid; Damien M Callahan; Robert J Carabello; Edward M Phillips; Walter R Frontera; Roger A Fielding Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.636