Literature DB >> 12586809

Importance of minimal residual disease testing during the second year of therapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Glenn M Marshall1, Michelle Haber, Edward Kwan, Ling Zhu, Daniella Ferrara, Chengyuan Xue, Michael J Brisco, Pamela J Sykes, Alexander Morley, Boyd Webster, Luciano Dalla Pozza, Keith Waters, Murray D Norris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A high level of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an indicator of relative chemotherapy resistance and a risk factor for relapse. However, the significance of MRD in the second year of therapy is unclear. Moreover, it is unknown whether treatment intervention can alter outcome in patients with detectable MRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the prognostic value of MRD testing in bone marrow samples from 85 children at 1, 12, and 24 months from diagnosis using clone-specific polymerase chain reaction primers designed to detect clonal antigen receptor gene rearrangements. These children were part of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, which, in the second year of treatment, compared a 2-month reinduction-reintensification followed by maintenance chemotherapy with standard maintenance chemotherapy alone.
RESULTS: MRD was detected in 69% of patients at 1 month, 25% at 12 months, and 28% at 24 months from diagnosis. By univariate analysis, high levels of MRD at 1 month, or the presence of any detectable MRD at 12 or 24 months from diagnosis, were highly predictive of relapse. Multivariate analysis showed that MRD testing at 1 and 24 months each had independent prognostic significance. Intensified therapy at 12 months from diagnosis did not improve prognosis in those patients who were MRD positive at 12 months from diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Clinical outcome in childhood ALL can be predicted with high accuracy by combining the results of MRD testing at 1 and 24 months from diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12586809     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy: a pathologist's perspective. II. interpretation of the bone marrow aspirate and biopsy.

Authors:  Roger S Riley; David Williams; Micaela Ross; Shawn Zhao; Alden Chesney; Bradly D Clark; Jonathan M Ben-Ezra
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Clinical utility of sequential minimal residual disease measurements in the context of risk-based therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; Deqing Pei; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Sima Jeha; Cheng Cheng; W Paul Bowman; John T Sandlund; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Hiroto Inaba; Deepa Bhojwani; Tanja A Gruber; Wing H Leung; James R Downing; William E Evans; Mary V Relling; Dario Campana
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  PCR-based clonality assessment in patients with lymphocytic leukaemias: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Bojana M Cikota; Ljiljana J Tukić; Olivera T Tarabar; Dragana T Stamatović; Marija N Elez; Zvonko M Magić
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Michael J Borowitz; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen P Hunger; W Paul Bowman; Andrew J Carroll; William L Carroll; Stephen Linda; Paul L Martin; D Jeanette Pullen; David Viswanatha; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi Winick; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Improving the identification of high risk precursor B acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with earlier quantification of minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Mawar Karsa; Luciano Dalla Pozza; Nicola C Venn; Tamara Law; Rachael Shi; Jodie E Giles; Anita Y Bahar; Shamira Cross; Daniel Catchpoole; Michelle Haber; Glenn M Marshall; Murray D Norris; Rosemary Sutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prognostic value of protease activated receptor-1 in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Adel A Hagag; Nahla A Nosair; Fatma M Ghaith; Eman H Elshenawy
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.