D F Roychowdhury1, A Hayden, A M Liepa. 1. Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. dfr@lilly.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis examined prognostic significance of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) parameters combined with baseline clinical factors on outcomes (overall survival, time to progressive disease, and time to treatment failure) in bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outcome and HRQoL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30) data were collected prospectively in a phase III study assessing gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. Prespecified baseline clinical factors (performance status, tumor-node-metastasis staging, visceral metastases [VM], alkaline phosphatase [AP] level, number of metastatic sites, prior radiotherapy, disease measurability, sex, time from diagnosis, and sites of disease) and selected HRQoL parameters (global QoL; all functional scales; symptoms: pain, fatigue, insomnia, dyspnea, anorexia) were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards model. Factors with individual prognostic value (P <.05) on outcomes in univariate models were assessed for joint prognostic value in a multivariate model. A final model was developed using a backward selection strategy. RESULTS: Patients with baseline HRQoL were included (364 of 405, 90%). The final model predicted longer survival with low/normal AP levels, no VM, high physical functioning, low role functioning, and no anorexia. Positive prognostic factors for time to progressive disease were good performance status, low/normal AP levels, no VM, and minimal fatigue; for time to treatment failure, they were low/normal AP levels, minimal fatigue, and no anorexia. Global QoL was a significant predictor of outcome in univariate analyses but was not retained in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: HRQoL parameters are independent prognostic factors for outcome in advanced bladder cancer; their prognostic importance needs further evaluation.
PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis examined prognostic significance of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) parameters combined with baseline clinical factors on outcomes (overall survival, time to progressive disease, and time to treatment failure) in bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outcome and HRQoL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30) data were collected prospectively in a phase III study assessing gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. Prespecified baseline clinical factors (performance status, tumor-node-metastasis staging, visceral metastases [VM], alkaline phosphatase [AP] level, number of metastatic sites, prior radiotherapy, disease measurability, sex, time from diagnosis, and sites of disease) and selected HRQoL parameters (global QoL; all functional scales; symptoms: pain, fatigue, insomnia, dyspnea, anorexia) were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards model. Factors with individual prognostic value (P <.05) on outcomes in univariate models were assessed for joint prognostic value in a multivariate model. A final model was developed using a backward selection strategy. RESULTS:Patients with baseline HRQoL were included (364 of 405, 90%). The final model predicted longer survival with low/normal AP levels, no VM, high physical functioning, low role functioning, and no anorexia. Positive prognostic factors for time to progressive disease were good performance status, low/normal AP levels, no VM, and minimal fatigue; for time to treatment failure, they were low/normal AP levels, minimal fatigue, and no anorexia. Global QoL was a significant predictor of outcome in univariate analyses but was not retained in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: HRQoL parameters are independent prognostic factors for outcome in advanced bladder cancer; their prognostic importance needs further evaluation.
Authors: David Cella; Joseph C Cappelleri; Andrew Bushmakin; Claudie Charbonneau; Jim Z Li; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; M Dror Michaelson; Robert J Motzer Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Laura A A Gilliam; Jennifer S Moylan; Leonardo F Ferreira; Michael B Reid Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: B K Hamilton; A D Law; L Rybicki; D Abounader; J Dabney; R Dean; H K Duong; A T Gerds; R Hanna; B T Hill; D Jagadeesh; M E Kalaycio; C Lawrence; L McLellan; B Pohlman; R M Sobecks; B J Bolwell; N S Majhail Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Deborah Watkins Bruner; Charlene J Bryan; Neil Aaronson; C Craig Blackmore; Michael Brundage; David Cella; Patricia A Ganz; Carolyn Gotay; Pamela S Hinds; Alice B Kornblith; Benjamin Movsas; Jeff Sloan; Lari Wenzel; Giles Whalen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hee Chul Park; Nora A Janjan; Tito R Mendoza; Edward H Lin; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Mandeep Hundal; Yiqun Zhang; Marc E Delclos; Christopher H Crane; Prajnan Das; Xin Shelley Wang; Charles S Cleeland; Sunil Krishnan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 7.038