Literature DB >> 12586112

Review on toxicity testing with marine macroalgae and the need for method standardization--exemplified with copper and phenol.

Britta T Eklund1, Lena Kautsky.   

Abstract

Toxic effects on macroalgae have been compiled. Eighty-two articles have been found in literature during 1959-2000. A total of 120 substances were investigated using 65 different macroalgae species. About one-third of the tested compounds were organic substances (33%), another third metal-organic substances (35%), and the last third were oils (14%), metals (8%), detergents (7.5%) and other inorganic chemicals (2.5%). Half of the substances were only tested once on a single species. Likewise, toxicity data has only been reported for one chemical tested on a single occasion for about half of the 65 species. Thus little is known about the toxic effects on marine macroalgae. The objectives of the previous studies undertaken varied and therefore the toxicity data was presented in numerous ways, e.g. using different exposure times, temperature, light intensity, light regime, salinity, and nutrients, which makes a direct comparison of the data difficult. This review also shows that many stages in the lifecycle of macroalgae are often more sensitive to toxic substances than other aquatic organisms. Consequently, tests using macroalgae may discover toxicity earlier, which would in turn also protect the fauna. If toxic compounds have a negative affect on the distribution and growth of structurally and functionally dominating macroalgae, there may indirectly be a large and harmful influence on the whole marine coastal ecosystem. For this reason tests on macroalgae should be included in control programs along the coasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12586112     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-326x(02)00225-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity of spore germination and germ tube elongation of Saccharina japonica to metal exposure.

Authors:  Taejun Han; Jeong-Ae Kong; Hee-Gyu Kang; Seon-Jin Kim; Gyo-Sun Jin; Hoon Choi; Murray T Brown
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Improved short-term toxicity test protocol to assess metal tolerance in phototrophic periphyton: toward standardization of PICT approaches.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Lambert; Stéphane Pesce; Arnaud Foulquier; Josiane Gahou; Marina Coquery; Aymeric Dabrin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Aquatic plants: Test species sensitivity and minimum data requirement evaluations for chemical risk assessments and aquatic life criteria development for the USA.

Authors:  Michael Lewis; Glen Thursby
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Halimeda jolyana (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) presents higher vulnerability to metal pollution at its lower temperature limits of distribution.

Authors:  Fernando Scherner; Eduardo Bastos; Ticiane Rover; Eliana de Medeiros Oliveira; Rafael Almeida; Ana Gabriela Itokazu; Zenilda Laurita Bouzon; Leonardo Rubi Rörig; Sonia Maria Barreto Pereira; Paulo Antunes Horta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Improving Toxicity Assessment of Pesticide Mixtures: The Use of Polar Passive Sampling Devices Extracts in Microalgae Toxicity Tests.

Authors:  Sandra Kim Tiam; Vincent Fauvelle; Soizic Morin; Nicolas Mazzella
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.