Literature DB >> 12585634

Retrograde embolisation of varicocele in the paediatric age group: a review of 10 years' practice.

C Sivanathan1, L J Abernethy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the 10 years' practice of retrograde embolisation of varicoceles in the paediatric age group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 40 boys (age range, 6-16 years), with varicocele diagnosed both clinically and sonographically, were referred to the radiology department for embolisation. Data of these patients were collected and analysed retrospectively. Patients' age, side, treatment, complications, and outcome were noted. The follow-up ranges from 2 months to 6 years (mean, 1.1 years).
RESULTS: In 24 patients (60%), embolisation was successful at the first attempt and 11 procedures (27.5%) were technical failures; 4 patients (10%) after venography were considered non-embolisable. One patient (2.5%) is yet to be seen in the clinic. Recurrence occurred in 4 patients (10%) of whom 3 had successful repeat embolisation. One patient with a recurrent varicocele did not wish further treatment. Out of the 11 failures, 5 underwent repeat embolisation with success in 3 patients and failure in two. Four patients had successful surgical ligation and 2 patients were treated conservatively. All who were non-embolisable were treated successfully by surgery. Our overall success rate was 65% (n = 26).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that embolisation is valuable as a first line of treatment for paediatric varicoceles provided a skilled interventional radiologist is available. This procedure is less invasive, avoids general anaesthetic, involves minimal postoperative pain, and allows an earlier return to normal activities. However, 35% of patients did eventually require conventional surgery for primary failure of embolisation or late recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12585634      PMCID: PMC1964351          DOI: 10.1308/003588403321001453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  6 in total

Review 1.  Varicocele: A Review.

Authors:  Brian F Baigorri; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Safety and effectiveness of the different types of embolic materials for the treatment of testicular varicoceles: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gregory C Makris; Evgenia Efthymiou; Mark Little; Phillip Boardman; Susan Anthony; Raman Uberoi; Charles Tapping
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Varicocele percutaneous embolization outcomes in a pediatric group: 7-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Sonaz Malekzadeh; Rodrigo A Fraga-Silva; Pierre-Henri Morère; Alexandra Sorega; Stephan Produit; Nikolaos Stergiopulos; Christophe Constantin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Retrograde percutaneous sclerotherapy of left idiopathic varicocele in children: results and follow-up.

Authors:  Claudio Granata; Mauro Oddone; Paolo Toma; Girolamo Mattioli
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Management options of varicoceles.

Authors:  Peter Chan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

6.  Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed M Al-Kandari; Abdulnasser Khudair; Abdelghaffar Arafa; Fouad Zanaty; Ahmed Ezz; Mohamed El-Shazly
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.