Literature DB >> 12585621

Re-assessing accumulated oxygen deficit in middle-distance runners.

D Bickham1, P Le Rossignol, C Gibbons, A P Russell.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to re-assess the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD), incorporating recent methodological improvements i.e., 4 min submaximal tests spread above and below the lactate threshold (LT). We Investigated the Influence of the VO2 -speed regression, on the precision of the estimated total energy demand and AOD. utilising different numbers of regression points and including measurement errors. Seven trained middle-distance runners (mean +/- SD age: 25.3 +/- 5.4y, mass: 73.7 +/- 4.3kg. VO2max 64.4 +/- 6.1 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) completed a VO2max, LT, 10 x 4 min exercise tests (above and below LT) and high-intensity exhaustive tests. The VO2 -speed regression was developed using 10 submaximal points and a forced y-intercept value. The average precision (measured as the width of 95% confidence Interval) for the estimated total energy demand using this regression was 7.8mL O2 Eq x kg(-1) x min(-1). There was a two-fold decrease in precision of estimated total energy demand with the Inclusion of measurement errors from the metabolic system. The mean AOD value was 43.3 mL O2 Eq x kg(-1) (upper and lower 95% CI 32.1 and 54.5mL o2 Eq x kg(-1) respectively). Converting the 95% CI for estimated total energy demand to AOD or including maximum possible measurement errors amplified the error associated with the estimated total energy demand. No significant difference in AOD variables were found, using 10,4 or 2 regression points with a forced y-intercept. For practical purposes we recommend the use of 4 submaximal values with a y-intercept. Using 95% CIs and calculating error highlighted possible error in estimating AOD. Without accurate data collection, increased variability could decrease the accuracy of the AOD as shown by a 95% CI of the AOD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12585621     DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(02)80026-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  7 in total

1.  Examining the accumulated oxygen deficit method in breaststroke swimming.

Authors:  Victor Machado Reis; Daniel Almeida Marinho; Fernando Policarpo Barbosa; António Malvas Reis; Laura Guidetti; António José Silva
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The maximal accumulated oxygen deficit method: a valid and reliable measure of anaerobic capacity?

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Jos J de Koning; Carl Foster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Anaerobic Capacity in Running: The Effect of Computational Method.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Glenn Björklund; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Prediction of the Wingate anaerobic mechanical power outputs from a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise stress test using machine-learning approach.

Authors:  Efrat Leopold; Dalya Navot-Mintzer; Eyal Shargal; Sharon Tsuk; Tamir Tuller; Mickey Scheinowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Anaerobic Capacity of Cross-Country Skiers: The Effect of Computational Method and Skiing Sub-technique.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Dionne A Noordhof; Nestor Lögdal
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-15

6.  A Comparison between Different Methods of Estimating Anaerobic Energy Production.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Effect of Computational Method on Accumulated O2 Deficit.

Authors:  Jon Ingulf Medbø; Boye Welde
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.