Literature DB >> 12584504

Danish chiropractic patients then and now--a comparison between 1962 and 1999.

Jan Hartvigsen1, Ole Bolding-Jensen, Henning Hviid, Niels Grunnet-Nilsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about changes in the chiropractic patient population over time.
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 surveys describing the Danish chiropractic patient population.
DESIGN: Data concerning location of primary complaint and its duration for patients in Danish chiropractic offices between 1962 and 1999 were compared.
SETTING: Private chiropractic practice and nonprofit research institution. OUTCOME MEASURES: Location of primary diagnosis/complaint, duration of complaint.
RESULTS: In 1962, data for 1118 patients were collected, with a participation rate of 93%. In 1999, data for 1897 patients were collected. Of all Danish chiropractic clinics, 88% participated in the study, and 94% of all eligible patients filled out a questionnaire. In both 1962 and 1999, the most frequent complaints were pain in the lower back or neck either alone or with radiation to the extremities (roughly 70% of patients). In 1962, almost 4 times as many patients complained of headache as in 1999 (11% vs 4%). Although there were significant differences, less that 10% of patients presented with a nonmusculoskeletal disorder in both 1962 and 1999 (7% vs 3%). In 1962, almost half of the patients had had their complaint for more than 1 year; in 1999, approximately 80% of patients had had their complaint for less than 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: In both 1962 and 1999, Danish chiropractors primarily treated patients with pain syndromes related to the lower back and neck. Patients presenting with type O disorders comprised less than 10% of the total patient population in both surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12584504     DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2003.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  7 in total

1.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The organisation of the stress response, and its relevance to chiropractors: a commentary.

Authors:  Katie Hardy; Henry Pollard
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 3.  Spine Care as a Framework for the Chiropractic Identity.

Authors:  Michael Schneider; Donald Murphy; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 4.  Chiropractic Identity: A Neurological, Professional, and Political Assessment.

Authors:  Anthony L Rosner
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 5.  The chiropractic profession: a scoping review of utilization rates, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and care provided.

Authors:  Peter J H Beliveau; Jessica J Wong; Deborah A Sutton; Nir Ben Simon; André E Bussières; Silvano A Mior; Simon D French
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 6.  A critical review of manual therapy use for headache disorders: prevalence, profiles, motivations, communication and self-reported effectiveness.

Authors:  Craig S Moore; David W Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  A scoping review of chiropractic management of female patients with infertility.

Authors:  Brian Budgell; Brenda Yee
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2018-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.