Literature DB >> 12583594

Direct and correlated responses to artificial selection on developmental time and wing length in Drosophila buzzatii.

Marcelo D Cortese1, Fabian M Norry, Romina Piccinali, Esteban Hasson.   

Abstract

Developmental time and body size are two positively correlated traits closely related to fitness in many organisms including Drosophila. Previous work suggested that these two traits are involved in a trade-off that may result from a negative genetic correlation between their effects on pre-adult and adult fitness. Here, we examine the evolution of developmental time and body size (indexed by wing length) under artificial selection applied to one or both traits in replicated D. buzzatii populations. Directional changes in both developmental time and wing length indicate the presence of substantial additive genetic variance for both traits. The strongest response to selection for fast development was found in lines selected simultaneously to reduce both developmental time and wing length, probably as an expected consequence of a synergistic effect of indirect selection. When selection was applied in the direction opposite to the putative genetic correlation, that is, large wing length but fast development, no responses were observed for developmental time. Lines selected to reduce both wing length and developmental time diverged slightly faster from the control than lines selected to increase wing length and reduce developmental time. However, wing length did not diverge from the control in lines selected only for fast development. These results suggest a complex genetic basis of the correlation between developmental time and wing length, but are generally consistent with the hypothesis that both traits are related in a trade-off. However, we found that this trade-off may disappear under uncrowded conditions, with fast-developing lines exhibiting a higher pre-adult viability than other lines when tested at high larval density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12583594     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  The genetic covariance among clinal environments after adaptation to an environmental gradient in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Carla M Sgrò; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Drosophila development, physiology, behavior, and lifespan are influenced by altered dietary composition.

Authors:  Kiel G Ormerod; Olivia K LePine; Prabhodh S Abbineni; Justin M Bridgeman; Jens R Coorssen; A Joffre Mercier; Glenn J Tattersall
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.160

3.  Environmentally induced changes in correlated responses to selection reveal variable pleiotropy across a complex genetic network.

Authors:  Kristin L Sikkink; Rose M Reynolds; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Natural selection on body size is mediated by multiple interacting factors: a comparison of beetle populations varying naturally and experimentally in body size.

Authors:  Angela R Amarillo-Suárez; R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Environmental stress and reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: starvation resistance, ovariole numbers and early age egg production.

Authors:  Marta L Wayne; Usha Soundararajan; Lawrence G Harshman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  A novel method for quantifying the rate of embryogenesis uncovers considerable genetic variation for the duration of embryonic development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Barbara Horváth; Andrea J Betancourt; Alex T Kalinka
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Effects of larval crowding on quantitative variation for development time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Barbara Horváth; Alex T Kalinka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Identifying candidate genes affecting developmental time in Drosophila melanogaster: pervasive pleiotropy and gene-by-environment interaction.

Authors:  Julián Mensch; Nicolás Lavagnino; Valeria Paula Carreira; Ana Massaldi; Esteban Hasson; Juan José Fanara
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Differences in tolerance to host cactus alkaloids in Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii.

Authors:  Ignacio M Soto; Valeria P Carreira; Cristian Corio; Julián Padró; Eduardo M Soto; Esteban Hasson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.