Literature DB >> 12582942

[Shunt operation versus endoscopic ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostics and outcome].

U Meier1.   

Abstract

In contrast to shunt operation the indication for an endoscopic ventriculostomy in patients diagnosed for normal pressure hydrocephalus is not scientifically established. From September 1997 to October 2001 we operated on 79 patients diagnosed for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Diagnosis was established by means of the intrathecal lumbal or ventricular infusion test, the cerebrospinal fluid tap test and MRI-CSF flow studies pre- and post-operatively. In 60 patients (76 %) we implanted a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (Miethke Dual-Switch valve), and in 15 patients (19 %) we performed the endoscopic assisted third ventriculostomy. With our created NPH recovery rate and use of the clinical grading for normal pressure hydrocephalus created by Kiefer we compared the operative results of both patient groups. Immediately after the operation the results are the same for both treatments. In the follow-up examination after 12 and 27 months patients who underwent a ventriculostomy showed a better outcome, but the underdrainage rate was higher. Concerning the operation related complications the shunt treatment leaded to 10 revisions (17 %) because of four infections (7 %), two shunt insufficiencies (3 %), two overdrainages (3 %), two catheter dislocations (3 %). The ventriculostomy leaded to one case with a pneumatocephalus (7 %) and one ischemic thalamic lesion (7 %). In both operation methods we saw cases of underdrainages, three after valve implantation (5 %) and two after ventriculostomy (13 %). In that patients we performed a change of the implanted valve with a lower pressure level or rather an implantation of a valve system in the two cases who underwent a ventriculostomy. In patients with a pathologically increased resistance to CSF outflow in the lumbal infusion test a shunt implantation with the Miethke Dual-Switch valve is indicated. Patients whose outflow resistance is increased in the ventricular infusion test are suspected for a functional interventricular stenosis and should be treated by means of an endoscopic assisted ventriculostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12582942     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir        ISSN: 0044-4251


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of different imaging modalities: is MRI a conditio sine qua non for ETV?

Authors:  Erik J van Lindert; Tjemme Beems; J André Grotenhuis
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a review study.

Authors:  Anastasia Tasiou; Alexandros G Brotis; Felice Esposito; Konstantinos N Paterakis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Paradigm shift in hydrocephalus research in legacy of Dandy's pioneering work: rationale for third ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Dan Greitz
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).

Authors:  Katarina Ivana Tudor; Mario Tudor; Jenny McCleery; Josip Car
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29

5.  Microsurgical third ventriculocisternostomy as an alternative to ETV: report of two cases.

Authors:  Erik J van Lindert
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Symptomatic Long-standing Overt Ventriculomegaly.

Authors:  Mustafa Balevi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.