Literature DB >> 12582194

Use of internal coils for independent and direct MR imaging-guided endovascular device tracking.

Reed A Omary1, Jordin D Green, Wayne S Fang, Ingmar Viohl, J Paul Finn, Debiao Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that a single internal guide wire coil (i) permits independent and direct depiction of guide wires and catheters and (ii) improves catheter-tracking accuracy and depiction compared to external receiver coils.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard 5-6-F angiographic catheters were filled with dilute 4% gadolinium chelate. A single 0.030-inch-diameter internal guide wire coil was placed inside the catheter. True fast imaging with steady-state precession was used to directly visualize the guide wire. Inversion recovery-prepared fast low-angle shot technique was used to track catheters over a thick slice. In phantom experiments, we compared catheter signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) with the internal coil and a phased-array surface coil with use of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Tip-tracking accuracy was assessed with use of linear regression. In pigs (n = 7), catheters and guide wires were independently tracked in real time.
RESULTS: In phantoms, catheter SNR with the internal coil (12.0) was significantly greater than that with the surface coil (4.0; P =.001). Tip-tracking accuracy was also improved with use of the internal coil (R(2) = 0.94 vs 0.50). In swine vasculature, catheters and guide wires could be directly and independently tracked at 1.7-2.0 frames per second. Catheters were clearly visualized with use of the internal coil, with a typical catheter background contrast-to-noise ratio of 6.6. Catheters were not visible with use of the external coil because of the small catheter size compared to the slice thickness.
CONCLUSION: Internal guide wire coils permit independent and direct depiction of guide wires and catheters in vivo for MR imaging-guided endovascular interventions. They also improve catheter tracking accuracy and depiction compared to external coils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12582194     DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000058328.82956.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  Value of MR contrast media in image-guided body interventions.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Mark Wilson
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-28

2.  First results in an MR imaging--compatible canine model of acute stroke.

Authors:  A Shaibani; S Khawar; W Shin; T A Cashen; B Schirf; M Rohany; S Kakodkar; T J Carroll
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging to guide pediatric endovascular procedures.

Authors:  A N Raval; R J Lederman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession for improved catheter-directed coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Jordin D Green; Reed A Omary; Brian E Schirf; Richard Tang; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  MR fluoroscopy in vascular and cardiac interventions (review).

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Steve W Hetts; Joey English; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.