Literature DB >> 12582044

Role of the nuclei in eyeblink conditioning.

David G Lavond1.   

Abstract

Evidence to date supports the strong conclusion that the cerebellum learns. Classical conditioning of the eyeblink response is critically dependent upon the cerebellum. The issue addressed here is whether cerebellar cortex or deep nuclei form the basic association. Learning occurs with large cerebellar cortical aspirations in rabbits and with a Purkinje-cell-deficient mutation in mice. The learned response is poorly timed, small in amplitude, and inconsistent in its occurrence. Learning nevertheless occurs. Lesions of the interpositus, on the other hand, prevent new learning and abolish previously learned conditioned responses. Small electrolytic lesions, kainic acid lesions, and temporary inactivation (cooling, muscimol, anisomycin) localize learning to the dorsolateral anterior interpositus nucleus. Learning-related unit activity-the signature of the engram-recorded throughout the brain depends on the interpositus. Electrical stimulation of interpositus afferents are needed for conditioning, and the conditioned interpositus has a lowered threshold. Finally, a recent anatomical study with electron microscopy shows synaptic changes in the excitatory inputs to the interpositus with conditioning. The interpositus is responsible for making the basic association between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, which in turn allows ancillary learning to occur in cerebellar cortex, and possibly brainstem and forebrain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12582044     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb07558.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  11 in total

1.  Persistent changes in the intrinsic excitability of rat deep cerebellar nuclear neurones induced by EPSP or IPSP bursts.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Jung Hoon Shin; David J Linden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Choline supplementation mitigates trace, but not delay, eyeblink conditioning deficits in rats exposed to alcohol during development.

Authors:  Jennifer D Thomas; Tuan D Tran
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 3.  Nothing can be coincidence: synaptic inhibition and plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  Jason R Pugh; Indira M Raman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Associative and non-associative blinking in classically conditioned adult rats.

Authors:  Derick H Lindquist; Richard W Vogel; Joseph E Steinmetz
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-11-27

5.  Eye-blink conditioning deficits indicate temporal processing abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Amanda R Bolbecker; Crystal S Mehta; Chad R Edwards; Joseph E Steinmetz; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Conditioned eyeblink learning is formed and stored without cerebellar granule cell transmission.

Authors:  Norio Wada; Yasushi Kishimoto; Dai Watanabe; Masanobu Kano; Tomoo Hirano; Kazuo Funabiki; Shigetada Nakanishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Impaired cerebellar-dependent eyeblink conditioning in first-degree relatives of individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Amanda R Bolbecker; Jerillyn S Kent; Isaac T Petersen; Mallory J Klaunig; Jennifer K Forsyth; Josselyn M Howell; Daniel R Westfall; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Differential mastication kinematics of the rabbit in response to food and water: implications for conditioned movement.

Authors:  Keith D Huff; Yukiko Asaka; Amy L Griffin; William P Berg; Matthew A Seager; Stephen D Berry
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar

9.  Ethanol-exposed neonatal rats are impaired as adults in classical eyeblink conditioning at multiple unconditioned stimulus intensities.

Authors:  Derick H Lindquist; Greta Sokoloff; Joseph E Steinmetz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Mechanisms for motor timing in the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Germund Hesslow; Javier F Medina
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.