Literature DB >> 12581462

Increased intake of fruit and vegetables: estimation of impact in terms of life expectancy and healthcare costs.

Jens Gundgaard1, Jørgen Nørskov Nielsen, Jens Olsen, Jan Sørensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is strong evidence that a high consumption of fruit and vegetables reduces the risk of developing many cancers. This study examined the economic consequences for the healthcare sector if people followed the recommendations and increased their intake of fruit and vegetables.
DESIGN: A life table was used to describe a base case population with respect to life expectancy, cancer incidence and healthcare costs. Relative risks of cancer for a high versus a low intake of fruit and vegetables were obtained from the literature and were used to simulate populations with a higher intake of fruit and vegetables. The empirical data consist of a 20% sample of the Danish population that was followed from 1993 to 1997. Civil registration numbers were used to link various computerised registers, in order to describe each individual in the sample in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.
RESULTS: The average daily intake of fruit and vegetables was assumed to be approximately 250 g for the general Danish population. Simulated intakes of 400 g and 500 g increased the life expectancy by 0.8 and 1.3 years, respectively. In addition, it was estimated that 19% and 32% of the cancer incidence could be prevented. The aggregate healthcare costs remained stable, as the resources saved due to a lower cancer incidence were offset by healthcare costs imposed by the fact that healthy people live longer and require more healthcare. However, the variations across age groups and health sectors were substantial. DISCUSSION: The study adopted a healthcare sector perspective. Only costs from hospitalisation and primary care were included in the calculations. The costs of changing people's dietary habits, i.e. education, information and promotion as well as other costs that would be relevant from a societal perspective, have not been taken into account. Furthermore, the transition from one level of intake to another is not the focus of the analysis, although it might take decades to observe the full effect of the dietary changes.
CONCLUSION: Empirical evidence suggests that a considerable fraction of all cancer incidences can be prevented by a higher intake of fruit and vegetables. That may result in improved public health (gain in life years) at no additional cost to the healthcare sector.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12581462     DOI: 10.1079/PHN2002355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  6 in total

Review 1.  Antioxidant properties of aminoethylcysteine ketimine decarboxylated dimer: a review.

Authors:  Alberto Macone; Mario Fontana; Marco Barba; Bruno Botta; Mirella Nardini; Francesca Ghirga; Andrea Calcaterra; Laura Pecci; Rosa Marina Matarese
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Pomegranate for Prevention and Treatment of Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  Pooja Sharma; Sarah F McClees; Farrukh Afaq
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Elicitation: a tool for enriching the bioactive composition of foods.

Authors:  Nieves Baenas; Cristina García-Viguera; Diego A Moreno
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Selecting interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: from policy to action, a planning framework case study in Western Australia.

Authors:  Christina M Pollard; Janette M Lewis; Colin W Binns
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2008-12-24

5.  Availability, quality and price of produce in low-income neighbourhood food stores in California raise equity issues.

Authors:  Wendi Gosliner; Daniel M Brown; Betty C Sun; Gail Woodward-Lopez; Patricia B Crawford
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Potential gains in life expectancy from reducing amenable mortality among people diagnosed with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Alex Dregan; Ann McNeill; Fiona Gaughran; Peter B Jones; Anna Bazley; Sean Cross; Kate Lillywhite; David Armstrong; Shubulade Smith; David P J Osborn; Robert Stewart; Til Wykes; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.