Quantification of feto-maternal haemorrhage (FMH) by flow cytometry: anti-fetal haemoglobin labelling potentially underestimates massive FMH in comparison to labelling with anti-D.

Many centres now routinely use flow cytometry to quantify feto-maternal haemorrhage (FMH). However, which flow cytometric method is the most accurate in quantifying FMH is currently unknown. An audit of clinical results in which FMH had been estimated by both directly conjugated monoclonal anti-D and anti-fetal haemoglobin (HbF) labelling suggested that the anti-HbF labelling method may underestimate massive FMH in comparison to labelling with anti-D. Subsequent to this audit, 46 samples of adult D-negative blood were spiked with varying amounts of D-positive cord blood (0.05-10% fetal cells per sample), and the number of fetal cells present was quantified by both labelling methods. The percentage of fetal cells detected by anti-D was not significantly different to the estimated percentage of fetal cells added to each sample (P = 0.636). However, anti-HbF labelling significantly underestimated the percentage of fetal cells present (P = 0.0001). In comparison to anti-D, the percentage of fetal cells detected by anti-HbF was also significantly lower (P < 0.0001). The difference in fetal cell detection between anti-D and anti-HbF labelling was only apparent in the spiked samples containing > or =1% fetal cells per sample. In samples containing < or =0.6% fetal cells, no significant difference in the detection of fetal cells between anti-D and anti-HbF labelling was observed (P = 0.11). To allow adequate immunoprophylaxis in D-negative mothers with massive FMH, we recommend that anti-D labelling should be used in the routine flow cytometric estimation of FMH.