Literature DB >> 12580839

The use of clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophins in conjunction with GnRH antagonist in an IVF/ICSI program is not a cost effective protocol.

Ragga Mansour1, Mohammed Aboulghar, Gamal I Serour, Hesham G Al-Inany, Ibrahim Fahmy, Yehia Amin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of a clomiphene citrate (CC)/human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)/GnRH antagonist protocol versus a long-acting GnRH agonist/hMG protocol. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty nine couples having their first trial of ICSI for male factor infertility were divided into two groups. Group I (no = 33) received CC 100-150 mg/day for five days starting from day 2 of the cycle and 150 IU of hMG/day on days 6-10. GnRH antagonist (Centrorelix) 0.25 mg/day was started when the leading follicle reached 16 mm in the absence of an LH surge. Group II (no = 156) received 0.1 mg Deacapeptyl/day as our standard long protocol.
RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy was observed in 8 out of the 33 cases in group I (24%) while in group II, 92 out of 156 achieved clinical pregnancy (59%), the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.019). The cost of medications/cycle was estimated to be 1110+/-492 E.P in group I, while it was 1928+/-456 E.P. in group II. However, the total cost per pregnancy was 19653 EP in group I and 10047 EP in group II.
CONCLUSION: The use of the clomid/hMG/antagonist protocol is not a cost effective strategy and should not be recommended in IVF-ICSI cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12580839     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.820108.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcome and costs with CC + gonadotropins and gnrha + gonadotropins during Ivf/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Peter Kovacs; Szabolcs Matyas; l Artur Bernard; Steven G Kaali
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: one perspective from the USA.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  [Economic studies of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer].

Authors:  Miaomiao Jing; Runju Zhang
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-07-25

4.  Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Gustavo Nardini Cecchino; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Antonio Garcia-Velasco; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 5.  Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment.

Authors:  Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Gemma Fabozzi; Roberta Venturella; Roberta Maggiulli; Rossella Mazzilli; Susanna Ferrero; Antonio Palagiano; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders.

Authors:  Shamim Pilehvari; Ensieh ShahrokhTehraninejad; Batool Hosseinrashidi; Fatemeh Keikhah; Fedyeh Haghollahi; Elham Aziminekoo
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2016-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.