| Literature DB >> 12580448 |
Gregory Schears1, Jin Shen, Jennifer Creed, Tatiana Zaitseva, David F Wilson, William J Greeley, Anna Pastuszko.
Abstract
Quantitative measurements of oxygen distribution in the microcirculation of the brain cortex of newborn piglets were made during different modes of cardiopulmonary bypass. Three groups of animals, anesthetized and mechanically ventilated, were studied. The first group of animals were maintained on normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at a flow of 100 ml/kg/min, while the second and third groups underwent low flow hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (40 ml/kg/min at 18 degrees C) (LFCPB) and deep hypothermic (18 degrees C) circulatory arrest (DHCA), respectively. After bypass, the piglets were monitored for a two hours post-bypass recovery period. CPB caused a decrease in the cortical oxygen from 62 +/- 3 mm Hg to 32 +/- 7 mm Hg at the beginning of bypass and to 36 +/- 5 mm Hg at the end of bypass. During the recovery period, cortical oxygenation steadily decreased, reaching 29 +/- 8 mm Hg at the end of the experiment. With initiation of LFCPB, cortical oxygen decreased to 22 +/- 7 mm Hg. Upon rewarming cortical oxygen increased to 37 +/- 5 mm Hg and then decreased again to about 30 mm Hg at the end of two hours of post-bypass recovery. Similar changes in cortical oxygenation were observed during DHCA. In DHCA cortical oxygen decreased to 19 +/- 4 mm Hg and during rewarming and recovery increased to 35 +/- 6 mm Hg. In conclusion, it has been shown that in newborn piglets recovering from CPB, LFCPB and DHCA, when the blood pressure remained above 55 mm Hg and therefore total blood flow should be well maintained, oxygen pressure in the microvasculature is significantly lower than for pre-bypass. It is suggested that the decreased oxygenation is due to increased heterogeneity in resistance in the microcirculatory units, resulting in broadened distribution of flow rates and oxygen levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12580448 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0205-0_53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol ISSN: 0065-2598 Impact factor: 2.622