Literature DB >> 12579629

Motor evoked potentials from the striated urethral sphincter: a comparison of concentric needle and surface electrodes.

Soren Brostrom1, Poul Jennum, Gunnar Lose.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare two different surface electrodes (intravaginal and intraurethral) with the concentric needle as a criterion standard and concomitant testing of the levator ani as a potential contaminator.
METHODS: Thirty healthy women with a mean age of 52 years. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare recorded latencies from the various electrodes and muscles.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the latencies recorded with the various electrodes from either muscle, but the limits of agreement were wide. However, the concentric needle electrodes proved more reliable with a higher rate of reproducible responses.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not encounter major difficulties in using the concentric needle electrode for recordings in the external urethral sphincter, and this electrode was also more reliable than either surface electrode. Therefore, we advocate the use of concentric needle electrodes in future studies. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12579629     DOI: 10.1002/nau.10030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  3 in total

1.  Activation of the striated urethral sphincter to maintain continence during dynamic tasks in healthy men.

Authors:  Ryan E Stafford; James A Ashton-Miller; Ruth Sapsford; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Extramuscular Recording of Spontaneous EMG Activity and Transcranial Electrical Elicited Motor Potentials in Horses: Characteristics of Different Subcutaneous and Surface Electrode Types and Practical Guidelines.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Stephen Michael Reed; Hanneke Irene Berends; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Corticospinal excitability measurements using transcranial magnetic stimulation are valid with intramuscular electromyography.

Authors:  Rebekah L S Summers; Mo Chen; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.