Literature DB >> 12579454

Atmospheric secondary inorganic particulate matter: the toxicological perspective as a basis for health effects risk assessment.

Richard B Schlesinger1, Flemming Cassee.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have provided evidence for an association between exposure to ambient particulate matter and increased mortality and morbidity. However, the exact physicochemical nature of the responsible components is not as yet clear. One major constituent of the ambient aerosol is secondary inorganic particles, which are produced within the atmosphere via chemical reactions and are dominated by sulfates and nitrates. This article reviews the biological effects resulting from exposure to these ambient aerosol constituents. It was developed based upon available data from peer reviewed published papers as well as publicly available reports on controlled animal and human clinical exposure studies. The aim was to provide a toxicological basis for addressing the issue of whether ambient concentrations of these secondary aerosols in two venues, namely the United States and the Netherlands, could be causally related to reported human health effects associated with exposure to ambient particulate matter. Evaluation of the toxicological database suggests that these particles have little biological potency in normal humans or animals, or in the limited compromised animal models studied at environmentally relevant levels. There are, however, some critical caveats in this analysis that must be considered. First, it is important to understand the relationship between animal exposure studies and actual human exposures, in terms of both particle size and inhaled dose. Second, it is necessary to consider the physicochemical characteristics of the chemical species within ambient air compared to the characteristics of those used in controlled studies. Third, there is the issue of relevance of the exposure models used in these studies to those populations that may be affected by exposure to ambient particulates. Finally, the potential for interactions between particulates and ambient gases in the total atmospheric mix must be considered in developing conclusions as to exposure concentrations for the former constituents of polluted air that may be hazardous to public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12579454     DOI: 10.1080/08958370304503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  31 in total

1.  Toxicological evaluation of realistic emission source aerosols (TERESA): introduction and overview.

Authors:  John J Godleski; Annette C Rohr; Choong M Kang; Edgar A Diaz; Pablo A Ruiz; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Semi-volatile components of PM2.5 in an urban environment: volatility profiles and associated oxidative potential.

Authors:  Milad Pirhadi; Amirhosein Mousavi; Sina Taghvaee; Martin M Shafer; Constantinos Sioutas
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Electrocardiographic and respiratory responses to coal-fired power plant emissions in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction: results from the Toxicological Evaluation of Realistic Emissions of Source Aerosols Study.

Authors:  Gregory A Wellenius; Edgar A Diaz; Tarun Gupta; Pablo A Ruiz; Mark Long; Choong Min Kang; Brent A Coull; John J Godleski
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  PM2.5 Synergizes With Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Suppress Alveolar Macrophage Function in Mice Through the mTOR Pathway.

Authors:  Jianlong Zhang; Chong Liu; Guangrong Zhao; Meng Li; Di Ma; Qingguo Meng; Wenli Tang; Qingrong Huang; Peimin Shi; Youzhi Li; Linlin Jiang; Xin Yu; Hongwei Zhu; Guozhong Chen; Xingxiao Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Meteorological influence on predicting surface SO2 concentration from satellite remote sensing in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Dan Xue; Jingyuan Yin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Design and Development of an Electrostatic Screen Battery for Emission Control (ESBEC).

Authors:  Taewon Han; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.433

7.  Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted Chinese city.

Authors:  Junji Cao; Hongmei Xu; Qun Xu; Bingheng Chen; Haidong Kan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants.

Authors:  Kirk R Smith; Michael Jerrett; H Ross Anderson; Richard T Burnett; Vicki Stone; Richard Derwent; Richard W Atkinson; Aaron Cohen; Seth B Shonkoff; Daniel Krewski; C Arden Pope; Michael J Thun; George Thurston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Composition of PM affects acute vascular inflammatory and coagulative markers - the RAPTES project.

Authors:  Maciej Strak; Gerard Hoek; Krystal J Godri; Ilse Gosens; Ian S Mudway; René van Oerle; Henri M H Spronk; Flemming R Cassee; Erik Lebret; Frank J Kelly; Roy M Harrison; Bert Brunekreef; Maaike Steenhof; Nicole A H Janssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is ambient PM2.5 sulfate harmful?

Authors:  Thomas Grahame; Richard Schlesinger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.