Literature DB >> 12578415

Systemic temperature and paralysis after thoracoabdominal and descending aortic operations.

Lars G Svensson1, Lev Khitin, Edward M Nadolny, Wendy A Kimmel.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Systemic temperature influences the development of neurologic deficits after aortic surgery.
DESIGN: Retrospective case-comparison study of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: We examined spinal cord injury according to mild passive hypothermia (mean temperature, 36.5 degrees C; n = 25), moderate active hypothermia (temperature range, 29 degrees C-32 degrees C; n = 76), or profound hypothermia (temperature, <20 degrees C; n = 31) for complex repairs in 132 patients. Aortic dissection was present in 67 patients (51%), 41 (31%) had leaks or rupture, 39 (30%) were reoperations on the descending thoracic aorta, and 27 (20%) had concurrent arch and/or ascending thoracic aortic repairs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Occurrence of permanent and transient deficits.
RESULTS: Five patients (3.8%) had permanent deficits. One (4.0%) of the 25 patients underwent mild hypothermia, 3 (3.9%) of the 76 patients who underwent moderate hypothermia, and 1 (3.2%) of the 31 patients who underwent profound hypothermia (P =.70). Reversible deficits occurred in 7 patients (total 32%) who underwent mild hypothermia, 2 patients (total 6.6%) underwent moderate hypothermia, and 1 (total 6.5%) underwent profound hypothermia (P =.004). Six were delayed neurologic deficits. Independent predictors were intercostal ischemic time (P =.02), mild hypothermia (P =.004), and no cerebrospinal fluid drainage (P =.05). The total 30-day survival was 92.4% (122 of 132 patients). The only multivariable predictor of death was acuity of surgery (namely, emergent, urgent, or elective) (P =.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or profound hypothermia resulted in fewer transient neurologic deficits. Thus, we recommend active cooling and cerebrospinal fluid drainage for most patients, and profound hypothermia for patients undergoing complex repairs and reoperations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12578415     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.2.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  6 in total

1.  Management of aortic dissection: medical therapy and intervention. Is there a growing role for endovascular techniques?

Authors:  Kristine C Orion; James H Black
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Protecting the brain and spinal cord in aortic arch surgery.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

Review 3.  Hypothermic treatment for acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W Dalton Dietrich; Allan D Levi; Michael Wang; Barth A Green
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Spinal cord injury following aortic arch replacement.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Tokuda; Kazuro Fujimoto; Yuji Narita; Masato Mutsuga; Sachie Terazawa; Hideki Ito; Yasumoto Matsumura; Wataru Uchida; Hisaaki Munakata; Shinichi Ashida; Tsukasa Ono; Toshihiko Nishi; Daisuke Yano; Shinichi Ishida; Fumiaki Kuwabara; Toshiaki Akita; Akihiko Usui
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A mouse model of ischemic spinal cord injury with delayed paralysis caused by aortic cross-clamping.

Authors:  Hamdy Awad; Daniel P Ankeny; Zhen Guan; Ping Wei; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  CNB-001 reduces paraplegia in rabbits following spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Paul A Lapchak; Paul D Boitano; Rene Bombien; Daisy Chou; Margot Knight; Anja Muehle; Mihaela Te Winkel; Ali Khoynezhad
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.135

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.