Literature DB >> 12577155

Patient recollection of airway suctioning in the ICU: routine versus a minimally invasive procedure.

Johannes P Van de Leur1, Jan Harm Zwaveling, Bert G Loef, Cees P Van der Schans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many patients have an unpleasant recollection of routine endotracheal suctioning after discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We hypothesized that through minimally invasive airway suctioning discomfort and stress may be prevented, resulting in less recollection.
DESIGN: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Two ICUs at the University Hospital of Groningen, the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with an intubation period exceeding 24 h were included.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either routine endotracheal suctioning (RES) or minimally invasive airway suctioning (MIAS) during the duration of intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Within 3 days after ICU discharge all patients were interviewed, regarding recollection and discomfort of suctioning. The level of discomfort was quantified on a visual analogue scale (VAS). We analyzed data from 208 patients (RES: n=113, and MIAS: n=95). A significantly lower prevalence of recollection of airway suctioning was found in the MIAS group (20%) compared to the RES group (41%) (P-value =0.001). No significant difference in level of discomfort was found between the RES and the MIAS group (P-value =0.136).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive airway suctioning results in a lower prevalence of recollection of airway suction than in RES, but not in discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12577155     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1640-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  10 in total

1.  [Recollections of ventilated patients after a stay in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  D Rosé; M Röggla; W Behringer; G Röggla; M Frass
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1999-02-26       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Recollection of intensive care unit admission in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J S Turner; S J Messervy; L A Davies
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Incidence of recall, nightmares, and hallucinations during analgosedation in intensive care.

Authors:  I Rundshagen; K Schnabel; C Wegner; SchulteJ am Esch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The effect of repeated endotracheal suctioning on arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  K S Stone; S D Bell; B A Preusser
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.257

5.  [The Maastricht aging study (MAAS). The longitudinal perspective of cognitive aging].

Authors:  J Jolles; M P van Boxtel; R W Ponds; J F Metsemakers; P J Houx
Journal:  Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1998-06

Review 6.  Anesthetics and cerebroprotection: experimental aspects.

Authors:  J R Kirsch; R J Traystman; P D Hurn
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1996

7.  Patients' recollection of intensive care unit experience.

Authors:  J S Turner; S J Briggs; H E Springhorn; P D Potgieter
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Patients' experience of confusion in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  H Laitinen
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.072

9.  Problems following discharge after intensive care.

Authors:  K Daffurn; G F Bishop; K M Hillman; A Bauman
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 10.  Localization in the amygdala of the amnestic action of diazepam on emotional memory.

Authors:  C Tomaz; H Dickinson-Anson; J L McGaugh; M A Souza-Silva; M B Viana; F G Graeff
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine-2003. Part 1: Respiratory failure, infection and sepsis.

Authors:  Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Updating the evidence-base for suctioning adult patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom J Overend; Cathy M Anderson; Dina Brooks; Lisa Cicutto; Michael Keim; Debra McAuslan; Mika Nonoyama
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Optimum sedation and analgesia in critical illness: we need to keep trying.

Authors:  Gavin G Lavery
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Discomfort and factual recollection in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Johannes P van de Leur; Cees P van der Schans; Bert G Loef; Betto G Deelman; Jan H B Geertzen; Jan H Zwaveling
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.