Literature DB >> 12576827

Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion.

Stephen Madersbacher1, Jochen Schmidt, Johannes M Eberle, Harriet C Thoeny, Fiona Burkhard, Werner Hochreiter, Urs E Studer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ileal conduit is considered a safe procedure and the gold standard to which newer forms of urinary diversion should be compared, although few long-term results are known. We analyzed a consecutive series of patients who lived a minimum of 5 years after ileal conduit diversion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 412 patients underwent ileal conduit diversion between 1971 and 1995 at our institution. We analyzed all conduit related complications occurring later than 3 months after surgery in 131 long-term survivors (survival 5 years or greater).
RESULTS: Median followup was 98 months (range 60 to 354). Overall 192 conduit related complications developed in 87 of 131 (66%) patients. The most frequent complications were related to kidney function/morphology in 35 patients (27%), stoma in 32 (24%), bowel in 32 (24%), symptomatic urinary tract infection (including pyelonephritis) in 30 (23%), conduit/ureteral anastomosis in 18 (14%) and urolithiasis in 12 (9%). Within the first 5 years complications developed in 45% of patients. This percentage increased to 50%, 54% and 94% in those surviving 10, 15 and longer than 15 years, respectively. In this last group 50% had upper urinary tract changes and 38% had urolithiasis, for which the respective numbers after 5 years were 12% and 17%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a high conduit related complication rate in long-term survivors and underlines the need for vigorous long-term followup. Only studies lasting more than 1 decade cover the entire morbidity spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576827     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051462.45388.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  69 in total

Review 1.  Surgical complications of urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott B Farnham; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Urolithiasis in enterocystoplasties.

Authors:  Christopher R J Woodhouse; William G Robertson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Intestinal oxalate absorption in patients with continent urinary diversion.

Authors:  Gerd E von Unruh; Friederike B Ernst; Matthias E Schmidt; Gabriel Steiner; Albrecht Hesse; Stefan C Müller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Staged based directed surveillance of invasive bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: valuable and effective?

Authors:  S Machele Donat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [The history of ureterosigmoidostomy].

Authors:  S C Müller; P J Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Urinary diversion--approaches and consequences.

Authors:  Raimund Stein; Markus Hohenfellner; Sascha Pahernik; Stephan Roth; Joachim W Thüroff; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  [Complications and their management after urinary diversion].

Authors:  S Rogenhofer; S C Müller; T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.