J S Weisbord1, M J Trepka, G Zhang, I P Smith, T Brewer. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program Office, Public Health Prevention Service, Atlanta, GA, USA. jweisbord@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common chronic blood borne viral infection in the United States. We assessed the HCV prevalence, risk factors, and sensitivity of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) routine screening criteria among clients of a large urban sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic. METHODS: Participants were recruited from a public STD clinic in Miami, Florida, and were interviewed regarding known and potential risk factors. The survey assessed CDC screening criteria, as well as other risk factors (for example, intranasal drug use, history of incarceration, exchanging sex for money, number of lifetime sex partners, and history of an STD). Testing was done by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). RESULTS: The prevalence of anti-HCV positivity was 4.7%. Four variables were significantly associated with being anti-HCV positive, independent of confounding factors. These included injection drug use (odds ratio (OR) = 31.6; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 11.0 to 90.5); history of incarceration (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 8.1); sexual contact with an HCV positive person (OR 12.7; 95% CI 2.5 to 64.7); and older age (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2, 1.6). The sensitivity of CDC's routine screening criteria was 69% and specificity was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anti-HCV in this clinic was similar to that determined in studies of comparable populations. Having sexual contact with an HCV positive person and history of incarceration were independently associated with being anti-HCV positive. CDC's screening criteria identified approximately two thirds of the anti-HCV positive participants.
OBJECTIVES:Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common chronic blood borne viral infection in the United States. We assessed the HCV prevalence, risk factors, and sensitivity of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) routine screening criteria among clients of a large urban sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic. METHODS:Participants were recruited from a public STD clinic in Miami, Florida, and were interviewed regarding known and potential risk factors. The survey assessed CDC screening criteria, as well as other risk factors (for example, intranasal drug use, history of incarceration, exchanging sex for money, number of lifetime sex partners, and history of an STD). Testing was done by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). RESULTS: The prevalence of anti-HCV positivity was 4.7%. Four variables were significantly associated with being anti-HCV positive, independent of confounding factors. These included injection drug use (odds ratio (OR) = 31.6; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 11.0 to 90.5); history of incarceration (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 8.1); sexual contact with an HCV positive person (OR 12.7; 95% CI 2.5 to 64.7); and older age (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2, 1.6). The sensitivity of CDC's routine screening criteria was 69% and specificity was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anti-HCV in this clinic was similar to that determined in studies of comparable populations. Having sexual contact with an HCV positive person and history of incarceration were independently associated with being anti-HCV positive. CDC's screening criteria identified approximately two thirds of the anti-HCV positive participants.
Authors: M J Alter; S C Hadler; F N Judson; A Mares; W J Alexander; P Y Hu; J K Miller; L A Moyer; H A Fields; D W Bradley Journal: JAMA Date: 1990-11-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: T Diaz; D C Des Jarlais; D Vlahov; T E Perlis; V Edwards; S R Friedman; R Rockwell; D Hoover; I T Williams; E R Monterroso Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: K Nakashima; S Kashiwagi; J Hayashi; A Noguchi; M Hirata; W Kajiyama; K Urabe; K Minami; Y Maeda Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1992-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: L M Kucirka; H Sarathy; P Govindan; J H Wolf; T A Ellison; L J Hart; R A Montgomery; R L Ros; D L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Marcia Russell; Meng-Jinn Chen; Thomas H Nochajski; Maria Testa; Scott J Zimmerman; Patricia S Hughes Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Toni Frederick; Pamela Burian; Norah Terrault; Mardge Cohen; Michael Augenbraun; Mary Young; Eric Seaberg; Jessica Justman; Alexandra M Levine; Wendy J Mack; Andrea Kovacs Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: M A Fill; L A Sizemore; M Rickles; K C Cooper; C M Buecker; H L Mullins; M G Hofmeister; W E Abara; M A Foster; A K Asher; W Schaffner; J R Dunn; T F Jones; C Wester Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Freke R Zuure; Anouk T Urbanus; Miranda W Langendam; Charles W Helsper; Charlotte H S B van den Berg; Udi Davidovich; Maria Prins Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 3.295