STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that exposure to hyperoxia during the postnatal period of rapid alveolar multiplication by septation would cause permanent impairments, even with moderate levels of hyperoxia. DESIGN: We exposed mouse pups to 65% O(2) (hyperoxic mice) or normoxia (normoxic mice) during their first postnatal month, and we analyzed lung histology, pulmonary mechanics, blood gas, and breathing pattern during normoxia or in response to chemical stimuli in adulthood, when they reached 7 to 8 months of postnatal age. RESULTS: Hyperoxic mice had fewer and larger alveoli than normoxic mice (number of alveoli per unit surface area of parenchyma, 266 +/- 62/mm(2) vs 578 +/- 77/mm(2), p < 0.0001) [mean +/- SD], the cause being impaired alveolarization (radial alveolar count, 5.8 +/- 0.2 in hyperoxic mice vs 10.5 +/- 0.5 in normoxic mice, p < 0.0001). Respiratory system compliance was higher in hyperoxic mice (0.098 +/- 0.006 mL/cm H(2)O) than in normoxic mice (0.064 +/- 0.006 mL/cm H(2)O, p < 0.016). Baseline tidal volume (VT) and breath duration (TTOT]) measured noninvasively by whole-body plethysmography were larger in hyperoxic mice than in normoxic mice (VT, + 15%, p < 0.01; TTOT, + 12%, p < 0.01). Despite these impairments, blood gas, baseline minute ventilation E, and E responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia were normal in hyperoxic mice, compared with normoxic mice. CONCLUSION: Hyperoxic exposure during lung septation in mice may cause irreversible lung injury and breathing pattern abnormalities in adulthood at O(2) concentrations lower than previously thought. However, ventilatory function and body growth were preserved, and ventilatory function showed no major abnormalities, at least at rest, despite early oxygen-induced injuries.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that exposure to hyperoxia during the postnatal period of rapid alveolar multiplication by septation would cause permanent impairments, even with moderate levels of hyperoxia. DESIGN: We exposed mouse pups to 65% O(2) (hyperoxic mice) or normoxia (normoxic mice) during their first postnatal month, and we analyzed lung histology, pulmonary mechanics, blood gas, and breathing pattern during normoxia or in response to chemical stimuli in adulthood, when they reached 7 to 8 months of postnatal age. RESULTS: Hyperoxic mice had fewer and larger alveoli than normoxic mice (number of alveoli per unit surface area of parenchyma, 266 +/- 62/mm(2) vs 578 +/- 77/mm(2), p < 0.0001) [mean +/- SD], the cause being impaired alveolarization (radial alveolar count, 5.8 +/- 0.2 in hyperoxic mice vs 10.5 +/- 0.5 in normoxic mice, p < 0.0001). Respiratory system compliance was higher in hyperoxic mice (0.098 +/- 0.006 mL/cm H(2)O) than in normoxic mice (0.064 +/- 0.006 mL/cm H(2)O, p < 0.016). Baseline tidal volume (VT) and breath duration (TTOT]) measured noninvasively by whole-body plethysmography were larger in hyperoxic mice than in normoxic mice (VT, + 15%, p < 0.01; TTOT, + 12%, p < 0.01). Despite these impairments, blood gas, baseline minute ventilation E, and E responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia were normal in hyperoxic mice, compared with normoxic mice. CONCLUSION: Hyperoxic exposure during lung septation in mice may cause irreversible lung injury and breathing pattern abnormalities in adulthood at O(2) concentrations lower than previously thought. However, ventilatory function and body growth were preserved, and ventilatory function showed no major abnormalities, at least at rest, despite early oxygen-induced injuries.
Authors: Bradley W Buczynski; Min Yee; B Paige Lawrence; Michael A O'Reilly Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Anne Hilgendorff; Irwin Reiss; Harald Ehrhardt; Oliver Eickelberg; Cristina M Alvira Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Jesus Prieto-Lloret; Maria Ramirez; Elena Olea; Javier Moral-Sanz; Angel Cogolludo; Javier Castañeda; Sara Yubero; Teresa Agapito; Angela Gomez-Niño; Asuncion Rocher; Ricardo Rigual; Ana Obeso; Francisco Perez-Vizcaino; Constancio González Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Stephanie A Shore; Erin S Williams; Lucas Chen; Leandro A P Benedito; David I Kasahara; Ming Zhu Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Vivek Balasubramaniam; Sharon L Ryan; Gregory J Seedorf; Emily V Roth; Thatcher R Heumann; Mervin C Yoder; David A Ingram; Christopher J Hogan; Neil E Markham; Steven H Abman Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Jennifer L Nichols; Wesley Gladwell; Kirsten C Verhein; Hye-Youn Cho; Jürgen Wess; Oscar Suzuki; Tim Wiltshire; Steven R Kleeberger Journal: FASEB J Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 5.191