Literature DB >> 12576257

Selecting suspension points and excising the vagina during Michigan four-wall sacrospinous suspension.

R Kearney1, J O L DeLancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the variations in the location of the vaginal apex and the length of vagina excised in women undergoing the Michigan four-wall sacrospinous suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
METHODS: A prospective observational study of 76 women who had the Michigan modification sacrospinous suspension performed between 1998 and 2001 for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse was carried out. Demographics and preoperative, operative, and postoperative findings were noted, including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification score. The locations of the suspension points relative to the hysterectomy scar were recorded. The amount of vagina excised at surgery and the pre- and postoperative vaginal lengths are reported.
RESULTS: The mean length and standard deviation of vagina excised was 4.6 +/- 2.5 cm. The apex created at sacrospinous fixation was at the hysterectomy scar in only seven women (9%). It was most often situated behind the hysterectomy scar, in 58 cases (76%); it was situated in front of it in 11 (14%). In seven women no vagina was excised, and in the remaining 69 women a mean length of 5.1 +/- 2.2 cm was removed. The mean vaginal lengths were 9.7 +/- 1.7 cm preoperatively and 9.4 cm +/- 0.8 postoperatively, a 0.3-cm difference.
CONCLUSION: When one performs the Michigan modification sacrospinous suspension, the chosen suspension points are often not at the hysterectomy scar, and in women with large prolapses excess vagina frequently is excised without compromising postoperative vaginal length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576257     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02464-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Clinical study of ischia spinous fascia fixation--a new pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Lan Zhu; Jinghe Lang; Qingxia Zhang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Outpatient Narcotic Use After Minimally Invasive Urogynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Angela S Kelley; Dee E Fenner; Mitchell B Berger
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Determinants of vagina by computed tomography in Korean women.

Authors:  Min Jeong Kim; Myung Shin Kim; In Yang Park; Sa Jin Kim
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

5.  Vaginal approach to vesicovaginal fistula and vaginal vault prolapse preserving sexual function by Latzko repair and sacrospinous suspension.

Authors:  Erin C Crosby; Mitchell B Berger; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Uterine prolapse: from antiquity to today.

Authors:  Keith T Downing
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-14

Review 7.  Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Julia Geynisman-Tan; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  A preliminary clinical report of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Zhenyue Qin; Zhiyong Dong; Huimin Tang; Shoufeng Zhang; Huihui Wang; Mingyue Bao; Weiwei Wei; Ruxia Shi; Jiming Chen; Bairong Xia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.