Literature DB >> 12575962

Troponin T and quantitative ST-segment depression offer complementary prognostic information in the risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients.

Padma Kaul1, L Kristin Newby, Yuling Fu, Vic Hasselblad, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Robert H Christenson, Robert A Harrington, E Magnus Ohman, Eric J Topol, Robert M Califf, Frans Van de Werf, Paul W Armstrong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to examine the prognostic relationship between baseline quantitative ST-segment depression (ST) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) elevation. The secondary objectives were to: 1) examine whether ST provided additional insight into therapeutic efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy similar to that demonstrated by cTnT; and 2) explore whether the time to evaluation impacted on each marker's relative prognostic utility.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) and cTnT measurements in risk-stratifying patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has not been evaluated comprehensively.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 959 patients enrolled in the cTnT substudy of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute coronary syndrome events in a Global Organization Network (PARAGON)-B trial. Patients were classified as having no ST (n = 387), 1 mm ST (n = 433), and ST > or =2 mm (n = 139). Forty-percent (n = 381) were classified as cTnT-positive based on a definition of > or =0.1 ng/ml.
RESULTS: Six-month death/(re)myocardial infarction rates were 8.4% among cTnT-negative patients with no ST and 26.8% among cTnT-positive patients with ST > or =2 mm. On ECGs done after 6 h of symptom onset, ST > or =2 mm was associated with higher risk compared to its presence on ECGs done earlier (odds ratio [OR] 7.3 vs. 2.1). In contrast, the presence of elevated cTnT within 6 h of symptom was associated with a higher risk of adverse events compared with elevations after 6 h (OR 2.4 vs. 1.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative ST and cTnT status are complementary in assessing risk among ACS patients and both should be employed to determine prognosis and assist in medical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12575962     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02824-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  Clinical implications of persistent ST segment depression after admission in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  M Kosuge; K Kimura; T Ishikawa; T Shimizu; K Hibi; N Nozawa; S Umemura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Non ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A simplified risk-orientated algorithm.

Authors:  David H Fitchett; Bjug Borgundvaag; Warren Cantor; Eric Cohen; Sanjay Dhingra; Stephen Fremes; Milan Gupta; Michael Heffernan; Heather Kertland; Mansoor Husain; Anatoly Langer; Eric Letovsky; Shaun G Goodman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Contemporary management of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  G A Large
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Novel Biomarkers: Utility in Patients with Acute Chest Pain and Relationship to Coronary Artery Disease on Coronary CT Angiography.

Authors:  Adefolakemi Babatunde; Asim Rizvi; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2014-07

5.  The ECG in acute coronary syndromes: new tricks from an old dog.

Authors:  H S Gurm; E J Topol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Relation between baseline risk and treatment decisions in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an examination of international practice patterns.

Authors:  P Kaul; L K Newby; Y Fu; D B Mark; S G Goodman; G S Wagner; R A Harrington; C B Granger; F Van de Werf; E M Ohman; P W Armstrong
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Clinical risk scoring beyond initial troponin values: results from a large, prospective, unselected acute chest pain population.

Authors:  Michael A McDonald; Brian Holroyd; Ann Comeau; Marilou Hervas-Malo; Robert C Welsh
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 8.  Emergency department and office-based evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; Deborah B Diercks; J Douglas Kirk
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Complementary prognostic values of ST segment deviation and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) study.

Authors:  Thao Huynh; James Nasmith; The Minh Luong; Martin Bernier; Chantal Pharand; Zhao Xue-Qiao; Robert P Giugliano; Pierre Theroux
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  A new simplified immediate prognostic risk score for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B A Williams; R S Wright; J G Murphy; E S Brilakis; G S Reeder; A S Jaffe
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.