Literature DB >> 12574565

Physical and social functioning after stroke: comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36.

Sue-Min Lai1, Subashan Perera, Pamela W Duncan, Rita Bode.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study evaluated assessments of physical functioning and social functioning using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) to characterize health-related quality of life for patients after stroke.
METHODS: The SIS and SF-36 were administered to 278 stroke subjects approximately 90 days after stroke. The SIS-16 and SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) domain characterize physical function, whereas the SIS Participation and SF-36 Social Functioning (SF) domains characterize social function. Descriptive statistics and an analysis of variance were used to characterize physical and social functioning after stroke across levels of the modified Rankin Scale (MRS). Rasch analysis was used to compare the hierarchies and ranges of item difficulties in the SIS-16 and the SF-36 PF domains, as well as in the SIS Participation and the SF-36 SF domains.
RESULTS: Item hierarchies for the SIS-16 and SF-36 PF domain demonstrate that the SIS-16 contains less difficult items that could differentiate physical function among patients with more severe limitations. Compared with the SF-36 SF domain, the item hierarchy for the SIS Participation domain contained more difficult items that could differentiate social function among patients who were more active. In contrast to SIS-16, the SF-36 PF has major floor effects. In contrast to SIS Participation, the SF-36 SF domain has major ceiling effects. Both SIS-16 and SF-36 PF were able to discriminate well among the MRS levels of 0 to 1, 2, 3, and 4. The SIS Participation domain was also able to discriminate across the MRS levels of 0 to 1, 2, and 3 to 4. On the other hand, the SF-36 SF was similar among MRS levels 0, 1, and 2 and among MRS levels 2, 3, and 4.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the physical and participation subscales of the SIS cover a wider range of item difficulty than their counterparts from the SF-36. Compared with the SF-36 PF and SF domains, the SIS-16 and SIS Participation are better able to capture physical functioning and social well-being in patients with strokes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12574565     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000054162.94998.c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  31 in total

Review 1.  The impact of neuropsychological deficits on functional stroke outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne Barker-Collo; Valery Feigin
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  The Nursing Home Physical Performance Test: A Secondary Data Analysis of Women in Long-Term Care Using Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Subashan Perera; David A Nace; Neil M Resnick; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2018-07-13

3.  Self-efficacy Mediates the Relationship between Balance/Walking Performance, Activity, and Participation after Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Meghan F Moore; Ryan Pohlig; Darcy Reisman
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.119

4.  Analyzing change in recovery patterns in the year after acute hospitalization.

Authors:  Janet A Prvu Bettger; Wendy J Coster; Nancy K Latham; Julie J Keysor
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Baseline Quality of Life and Risk of Stroke in the ALLHAT Study (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial).

Authors:  Tanzila Shams; Alexander P Auchus; Suzanne Oparil; Clinton B Wright; Jackson Wright; Anthony J Furlan; Cathy A Sila; Barry R Davis; Sara Pressel; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Paula T Einhorn; Alan J Lerner
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Use of calcium channel blockers after stroke is not associated with poor outcome: a cohort from the registry of the Canadian stroke network.

Authors:  Dar Dowlatshahi; Jiming Fang; Marc Kawaja; Antoine Hakim
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.

Authors:  Poyu Chen; Keh-Chung Lin; Rong-Jiuan Liing; Ching-Yi Wu; Chia-Ling Chen; Ku-Chou Chang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  How to improve walking, balance and social participation following stroke: a comparison of the long term effects of two walking aids--canes and an orthosis TheraTogs--on the recovery of gait following acute stroke. A study protocol for a multi-centre, single blind, randomised control trial.

Authors:  Clare Maguire; Judith M Sieben; Florian Erzer; Beat Goepfert; Matthias Frank; Georg Ferber; Melissa Jehn; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; Robert A de Bie
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Measuring stroke impact with SIS: construct validity of SIS telephone administration.

Authors:  Sooyeon Kwon; Pamela Duncan; Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Sue Min Lai; Dean Reker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provided valid, reliable, and responsive score estimates of functioning and well-being during the first year of recovery from stroke.

Authors:  Patrick J Doyle; Malcolm R McNeil; James E Bost; Katherine B Ross; Julie L Wambaugh; William D Hula; Joseph M Mikolic
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.