Literature DB >> 12573757

Radiotherapy alone in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer with telecobalt and low-dose-rate brachytherapy: retrospective analysis of results and variables.

Robson Ferrigno1, Sérgio Luis Campos de Oliveira Faria, Eduardo Weltman, João Victor Salvajoli, Roberto Araújo Segreto, Ayrton Pastore, Wladimir Nadalin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis aims to report results and variables from patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy alone with telecobalt and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1989 and September 1995, 190 patients with histologic diagnosis of cervix carcinoma were treated with telecobalt for external beam radiotherapy (EBR), followed by one or two insertions of LDRB. Stage distribution according to patients was the following: IB, 12; IIA, 4; IIB, 105; and IIIB, 69. Median dose of EBR at whole pelvis was 40 Gy, and median parametrial doses for Stages II and III patients were 50 Gy and 60 Gy, respectively. Median doses of LDRB at point A for patients treated with one and two insertions were 38 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 70 months (range: 8-127 months). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and 5-year local control of patients at Stages I, II, and III were 83%, 78%, and 46%; 83%, 82%, and 49%; and 92%, 87%, and 58%, respectively. Overall incidence of late complications in the rectum, small bowel, and urinary tract was 15.3% (19/190), 4.2% (8/190), and 6.8% (13/190), respectively. The actuarial 5-year rectal, small bowel, and urinary incidence of late complications was 16.1%, 4.6%, and 7.6%, respectively. Clinical stage was the only significant variable for overall 5-year survival (p = 0.001), for disease-free survival (p = 0.001), and for local control (p = 0.001). Stage II patients more than 50 years old had better disease-free survival and local control at 5 years (p = 0.004). None of the analyzed variables influenced the actuarial 5-year incidence of late complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this series suggest that the use of telecobalt equipment for EBR with doses up to 50 Gy at whole pelvis, prior to brachytherapy, is an acceptable technique for radiation therapy alone in the treatment of cervix cancer, especially in developing countries, including Brazil, where telecobalt machines still prevail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12573757     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03939-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  Cervical Cancer in Ethiopia: The Effect of Adherence to Radiotherapy on Survival.

Authors:  Ulrike Moelle; Assefa Mathewos; Abreha Aynalem; Tigeneh Wondemagegnehu; Bekuretsion Yonas; Matthias Begoihn; Adamu Addissie; Susanne Unverzagt; Ahmedin Jemal; Christoph Thomssen; Dirk Vordermark; Eva J Kantelhardt
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-03-22

2.  Clinical significance of cumulative biological effective dose and overall treatment time in the treatment of carcinoma cervix.

Authors:  Abhijit Mandal; Anupam Kumar Asthana; Lalit Mohon Aggarwal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2007-04

3.  Definitive radiotherapy for uterine cervix cancer: long term results for patients treated in the period from 1998 till 2002 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana.

Authors:  Helena Barbara Zobec Logar; Barbara Segedin; Robert Hudej; Primoz Petric
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Epidemiology and outcome of cervical cancer in national institute of Morocco.

Authors:  Sanaa Elmajjaoui; Nabil Ismaili; Hanane El Kacemi; Tayeb Kebdani; Hassan Sifat; Noureddine Benjaafar
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Elevated circulating tumor cells and squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels predict poor survival for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yue-Feng Wen; Tian-Tian Cheng; Xiao-Long Chen; Wen-Jin Huang; Hai-Hua Peng; Tong-Chong Zhou; Xiao-Dan Lin; Li-Si Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.