Literature DB >> 12573080

Social status and adult heights in the two Germanies.

J Komlos1, P Kriwy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of evidence prevented hitherto the systematic comparison of physical stature across East and West Germany. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare heights by social status in the two Germanies with very different socio-economic and political systems prior to unification. DATA: The German Federal Health Survey of 1998 (Public Use File BGS98), a cross-sectional random sample of 7124 adult males and females between ages 18 and 79 (birth cohorts of 1919-1980) is used in the analysis.
RESULTS: There are considerable and persistent differences by social status in both East and West Germany over time. The West German height advantage among men increases with social status, whereas among women the opposite is the case. East German men born after the Berlin Wall was built became significantly shorter, but East Germans regained equality with West Germans after unification. In contrast, East German females were markedly shorter than their West German counterparts throughout the period considered.
CONCLUSIONS: The West German capitalistic welfare state provided a more propitious environment for the physical growth of the human organism than did the socialist East German government. There were substantial social differences in height in the officially classless German Democratic Republic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12573080     DOI: 10.1080/03014460210151723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  7 in total

1.  Does adult height predict later mortality?: Comparative evidence from the Early Indicators samples in the United States.

Authors:  Sven E Wilson
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.184

2.  Can resource dilution explain differences in height by birth order and family size? A study of 389,287 male recruits in twentieth-century Netherlands.

Authors:  Laura Stradford; Frans van Poppel; L H Lumey
Journal:  Hist Fam       Date:  2016-10-17

3.  Trends in the association between height and socioeconomic indicators in France, 1970-2003.

Authors:  Archana Singh-Manoux; Julie Gourmelen; Jane Ferrie; Karri Silventoinen; Alice Guéguen; Silvia Stringhini; Hermann Nabi; Mika Kivimaki
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Mapping the Mountains of Giants: Anthropometric Data from the Western Balkans Reveal a Nucleus of Extraordinary Physical Stature in Europe.

Authors:  Pavel Grasgruber; Bojan Mašanovic; Stipan Prce; Stevo Popović; Fitim Arifi; Duško Bjelica; Dominik Bokůvka; Jan Cacek; Ivan Davidović; Jovan Gardašević; Eduard Hrazdira; Sylva Hřebíčková; Pavlina Ingrová; Predrag Potpara; Nikola Stračárová; Gregor Starc; Nataša Mihailović
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21

5.  Differences in height by education among 371,105 Dutch military conscripts.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Frans van Poppel; L H Lumey
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.184

Review 6.  Growth and puberty in German children: is there still a positive secular trend?

Authors:  Bettina Gohlke; Joachim Woelfle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Body Mass Index Categories and Attained Height in Portuguese Adults.

Authors:  Rafaela Rosário; Renata Barros; Patrícia Padrão; Rute Santos; Vitor Hugo Teixeira; Oscar Lopes; Nelson Andrade; Andre Moreira; Pedro Moreira
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.942

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.