Literature DB >> 12572180

Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology.

John A Svirsky1, James C Burns, William M Carpenter, Donald M Cohen, Indraneel Bhattacharyya, John E Fantasia, David A Lederman, Denis P Lynch, James J Sciubba, Susan L Zunt.   

Abstract

Oral brush biopsy results were compared with scalpel biopsy and histology to determine the positive predictive value of an abnormal brush biopsy finding. Of 243 patients with abnormal brush biopsies, 93 proved positive for dysplasia (79) or carcinoma (14) and 150 were negative for either dysplasia or carcinoma. Therefore, the positive predictive value of an abnormal brush biopsy was 38% (93/243). By using the oral brush biopsy, dentists can inform their patients that abnormal findings have a strong positive predictive value for dysplasia or carcinoma and therefore require follow-up confirmation by scalpel biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12572180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Dent        ISSN: 0363-6771


  19 in total

1.  High-molecular tenascin-C as an indicator of atypical cells in oral brush biopsies.

Authors:  O Driemel; R Dahse; A Berndt; H Pistner; S G Hakim; L Zardi; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  [Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

Authors:  M Hullmann; T E Reichert; R Dahse; F von Eggeling; H Pistner; H Kosmehl; O Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

3.  Ex vivo photodynamic diagnosis to detect malignant cells in oral brush biopsies.

Authors:  Laila Omar Hamad; Anja Vervoorts; Thomas Hennig; Rainer Bayer
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Paul Brocklehurst; Alexander R Kerr; Joseph L Y Liu; Mark W Lingen; Graham R Ogden; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Crispian Scully
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-29

Review 5.  Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection of oral cancer.

Authors:  Mark W Lingen; John R Kalmar; Theodore Karrison; Paul M Speight
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 6.  Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Eric M Genden; Alfio Ferlito; Carl E Silver; Robert P Takes; Carlos Suárez; Randall P Owen; Missak Haigentz; Sandro J Stoeckli; Ashok R Shaha; Alexander D Rapidis; Juan Pablo Rodrigo; Alessandra Rinaldo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Nuclear F-actin Cytology in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  M P McRae; A R Kerr; M N Janal; M H Thornhill; S W Redding; N Vigneswaran; S K Kang; R Niederman; N J Christodoulides; D A Trochesset; C Murdoch; I Dapkins; J Bouquot; S S Modak; G W Simmons; J T McDevitt
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Applications of OralCDx® methodology in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia.

Authors:  Flavio Seijas-Naya; Tamara García-Carnicero; Pilar Gándara-Vila; Elena Couso-Folgueiras; Mario Pérez-Sayáns; Rafael Gándara-Vila; Abel García-García; José-Manuel Gándara-Rey
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 9.  Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Fedele
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-01-30

10.  The sensitivity and specificity of computerized brush biopsy and scalpel biopsy in diagnosing oral premalignant lesions: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sridhar G Reddy; Surekha Kanala; Anuradha Chigurupati; Shamala Ravi Kumar; Chandhra Sekhar Poosarla; B Venkata Ramana Reddy
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.