Bruce C Bostrom1, Gary R Erdmann, Barton A Kamen. 1. Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Children's Hospitals and Clinics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. bostrom@childrenshc.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare systemic exposure after intrathecal and oral methotrexate administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed red cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentrations with a sensitive radioligand-binding assay in 80 patients enrolled in the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) trial 1922 for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methotrexate concentrations were measured 7 days after the last doses of intrathecal and oral routes, using patients as their own controls. Intrathecal methotrexate was given on an age-adjusted schedule. Data was normalized to the actual dose received per body surface area. RESULTS: The mean red cell methotrexate concentration 7 days after the last of four weekly intrathecal doses of methotrexate was 178 pmol/mL red blood cells, which was significantly greater than the result 7 days after subsequent weekly oral methotrexate of 122 pmol/mL (P = 0.00001). Intrathecal dosing resulted in an average systemic exposure ratio of 1.7 to 1 compared with oral administration. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal methotrexate administration results in significantly greater systemic exposure than oral administration. Our data support the hypothesis that the systemic effect of intrathecal methotrexate affects ALL therapy.
PURPOSE: To compare systemic exposure after intrathecal and oral methotrexate administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed red cell methotrexate polyglutamate concentrations with a sensitive radioligand-binding assay in 80 patients enrolled in the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) trial 1922 for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methotrexate concentrations were measured 7 days after the last doses of intrathecal and oral routes, using patients as their own controls. Intrathecal methotrexate was given on an age-adjusted schedule. Data was normalized to the actual dose received per body surface area. RESULTS: The mean red cell methotrexate concentration 7 days after the last of four weekly intrathecal doses of methotrexate was 178 pmol/mL red blood cells, which was significantly greater than the result 7 days after subsequent weekly oral methotrexate of 122 pmol/mL (P = 0.00001). Intrathecal dosing resulted in an average systemic exposure ratio of 1.7 to 1 compared with oral administration. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal methotrexate administration results in significantly greater systemic exposure than oral administration. Our data support the hypothesis that the systemic effect of intrathecal methotrexate affects ALL therapy.
Authors: Anna M Thomsen; Maria E Gulinello; Jing Wen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Peter D Cole Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Yousif Matloub; Susan Lindemulder; Paul S Gaynon; Harland Sather; Mei La; Emmett Broxson; Rochelle Yanofsky; Raymond Hutchinson; Nyla A Heerema; James Nachman; Marilyn Blake; Linda M Wells; April D Sorrell; Margaret Masterson; John F Kelleher; Linda C Stork Journal: Blood Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Wanda L Salzer; Tamekia L Jones; Meenakshi Devidas; Joanne M Hilden; Naomi Winick; Stephen Hunger; William L Carroll; Bruce Camitta; ZoAnn E Dreyer Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Jun J Yang; Cheng Cheng; Wenjian Yang; Deqing Pei; Xueyuan Cao; Yiping Fan; Stanley B Pounds; Geoffrey Neale; Lisa R Treviño; Deborah French; Dario Campana; James R Downing; William E Evans; Ching-Hon Pui; Meenakshi Devidas; W P Bowman; Bruce M Camitta; Cheryl L Willman; Stella M Davies; Michael J Borowitz; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger; Mary V Relling Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K Schmiegelow; E Forestier; J Kristinsson; S Söderhäll; K Vettenranta; R Weinshilboum; F Wesenberg Journal: Leukemia Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Johan G C van Hasselt; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ahmed F Hawwa; Abdelqader Albawab; Madeleine Rooney; Lucy R Wedderburn; Michael W Beresford; James C McElnay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 3.240