Literature DB >> 12571307

Tibial plafond fractures. How do these ankles function over time?

J Lawrence Marsh1, Dennis P Weigel, Douglas R Dirschl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intermediate outcome of fractures of the tibial plafond treated with current techniques has not been reported, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study, performed at a minimum of five years after injury, was to determine the effect of these fractures on ankle function, pain, and general health status and to determine which factors predict favorable and unfavorable outcomes.
METHODS: Fifty-six ankles (fifty-two patients) with a tibial plafond fracture were treated with a uniform technique consisting of application of a monolateral hinged transarticular external fixator coupled with screw fixation of the articular surface. Thirty-one patients with thirty-five involved ankles returned between five and twelve years after the injury for a physical examination, assessment of ankle pain and function with the Iowa Ankle Score and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, assessment of general health status with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and radiographic examination of the ankle.
RESULTS: Arthrodesis had been performed on five of the forty ankles for which the outcome was known at a minimum of five years after the injury. Other than removal of prominent screws (two patients), no other surgical procedure had been performed on any patient. The average Iowa Ankle Score was 78 points (range, 28 to 96 points). The scores on the SF-36 and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale demonstrated a long-term negative effect of the injury on general health and on ankle pain and function when compared with those parameters in age-matched controls. The degree of osteoarthrosis was grade 0 in three ankles, grade 1 in six, grade 2 in twenty, and grade 3 in six. The majority of patients had some limitation with regard to recreational activities, with an inability to run being the most common complaint (twenty-seven of the thirty-one patients). Fourteen patients changed jobs because of the ankle injury. Fifteen ankles were rated by the patient as excellent; ten, as good; seven, as fair; and one, as poor. Nine patients with previously recorded ankle scores had better scores after the longer follow-up interval. The patients perceived that their condition had improved for an average of 2.4 years after the injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Although tibial plafond fractures have an intermediate-term negative effect on ankle function and pain and on general health, few patients require secondary reconstructive procedures and symptoms tend to decrease for a long time after healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12571307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  41 in total

1.  Chondrogenic progenitor cells respond to cartilage injury.

Authors:  Dongrim Seol; Daniel J McCabe; Hyeonghun Choe; Hongjun Zheng; Yin Yu; Keewoong Jang; Morgan W Walter; Abigail D Lehman; Lei Ding; Joseph A Buckwalter; James A Martin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-11

2.  Intermediate-term follow-up after ankle distraction for treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mai P Nguyen; Douglas R Pedersen; Yubo Gao; Charles L Saltzman; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A method for the estimation of normative bone surface area to aid in objective CT-based fracture severity assessment.

Authors:  Thaddeus P Thomas; Donald D Anderson; J Lawrence Marsh; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2008

4.  An instrumented pendulum system for measuring energy absorption during fracture insult to large animal joints in vivo.

Authors:  B W Diestelmeier; M J Rudert; Y Tochigi; T E Baer; D C Fredericks; T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Synthesis of a novel photopolymerized nanocomposite hydrogel for treatment of acute mechanical damage to cartilage.

Authors:  Kathryn E Schlichting; Trishelle M Copeland-Johnson; Matthew Goodman; Robert J Lipert; Tanya Prozorov; Xunpei Liu; Todd O McKinley; Zhiqun Lin; James A Martin; Surya K Mallapragada
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Outcome of 28 open pilon fractures with injury severity-based fixation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Danoff; Comron Saifi; David C Goodspeed; J Spence Reid
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-26

7.  Lipid profile of human synovial fluid following intra-articular ankle fracture.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Leimer; Kirk L Pappan; Dana L Nettles; Richard D Bell; Mark E Easley; Steven A Olson; Lori A Setton; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Clinical outcome and changes in gait pattern after pilon fractures.

Authors:  Hendrik Jansen; Annabel Fenwick; Stefanie Doht; Soenke Frey; Rainer Meffert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of isolated ankle osteoarthritis with arthrodesis or the total ankle replacement: a comparison of early outcomes.

Authors:  Charles L Saltzman; Robert G Kadoko; Jin Soo Suh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-02-04

10.  Management of distal tibial intra-articular fractures with circular external fixation.

Authors:  G Lovisetti; M A Agus; F Pace; D Capitani; F Sala
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.