Literature DB >> 12569595

Quantitative biopsy pathology for the prediction of pathologically organ-confined prostate carcinoma: a multiinstitutional validation study.

Alexander Haese1, Manisha Chaudhari, M Craig Miller, Jonathan I Epstein, Hartwig Huland, Juri Palisaar, Markus Graefen, Peter Hammerer, Edward C Poole, Gerard J O'Dowd, Alan W Partin, Robert W Veltri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative biopsy pathology with prostate specific antigen significantly improves the prediction of pathologic stage in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma (PCa). The authors recently reported a computational model for predicting patient specific likelihood of organ confinement of PCa using biopsy pathology and clinical data. The current study validates the initial models and presents an new, improved tool for clinical decision making.
METHODS: The authors assessed 10 biopsy pathologic parameters and 2 clinical parameters using data from two institutions. Of 1287 patients, 798 men had pathologically organ confined (OC) PCa, 282 men had nonorgan-confined disease with capsular penetration (NOC-CP) only, and 207 men showed seminal vesicle or lymph node invasion (NOC-AD) after undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy. Patient input data were evaluated by ordinal logistic (OLOGIT) and neural network (NN) models; and the likelihood of developing OC, NOC-CP, or NOC-AD disease was calculated for the combined and separate data sets and was compared with the results from original presentation. In addition, a new two-output model was constructed (OC/NOC-CP vs. NOC-AD).
RESULTS: The three-output OLOGIT and NN models predicted OC disease with 95.0% and 98.6% accuracy, respectively, for the combined data set and with 93.0% and 98.6% accuracy, respectively, on subset analysis. The combined accuracy for predicting OC, NOC-CP, and NOC-AD disease in the entire validation set was 66.7% for OLOGIT model and 66.0% for the NN model. The two-output OLOGIT and NN models correctly predicted 94.9% and 100.0% of all OC/NOC-CP disease, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both computation models predicted OC PCa with an accuracy of 93.0-98.6% when they were validated with two different data sets. The OLOGIT and NN-based, two-output model permitted an appropriate treatment decision for 85.2-90.2% of patients. These data support the use of quantitative pathology and clinical data-based decision modeling to manage patients with clinically localized PCa. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12569595     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  [Research in urologic university clinics. Assessment of current status and perspectives].

Authors:  K Miller; H Krause
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prediction of patient-specific risk and percentile cohort risk of pathological stage outcome using continuous prostate-specific antigen measurement, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Sumit Isharwal; Alexander Haese; Felix K H Chun; Danil V Makarov; Ziding Feng; Misop Han; Elizabeth Humphreys; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Prostate cancer: Can image-guided biopsy findings evaluate risk of ECE?

Authors:  Daniel Portalez; Bernard Malavaud
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  Shared decision-making--results from an interdisciplinary consulting service for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Schostak; T Wiegel; M Müller; S Hoecht; M Schrader; B Straub; D Bottke; W Hinkelbein; K Miller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  DNA Ploidy as surrogate for biopsy gleason score for preoperative organ versus nonorgan-confined prostate cancer prediction.

Authors:  Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Evaluation of prediction models for the staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Susie Boyce; Yue Fan; Ronald William Watson; Thomas Brendan Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.