Literature DB >> 12568991

Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood--comparison between waterbath and dry warming device.

C Röllig1, J Babatz, I Wagner, A Maiwald, V Schwarze, G Ehninger, M Bornhäuser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) is routinely performed for autologous and allogeneic MPB transplantation. Usually thawing is achieved by submerging the cell bag in a waterbath (37 degrees C temperature). We compared the effectiveness of thawing cryopreserved MPB in a waterbath with an electric dry-warming device containing warmed gel pads (Sahara, Transmed).
METHODS: Two cryopreserved bags from each of 31 apheresis procedures were thawed in a waterbath and under dry conditions in parallel. Viability (dye exclusion), apoptosis/necrosis (annexin/propidiumiodide staining) and clonogenic potential (CFU-E plus BFU-E, CFU-GM) of the cells were tested after thawing.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis by Wilcoxon matched-pair test showed no significant difference between the thawing procedures in terms of the in vitro parameters tested. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that thawing of cryopreserved MPB using dry warming and water bath give similar viability, apoptosis/necrosis rate and clonogenic potential. Both procedures take about the same amount of time and are easy to perform. Nevertheless, the potentially decreased risk of bacterial contamination of either the cell product or the patient room, and guidelines of good clinical practice (GCP), favor the use of the dry warming procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12568991     DOI: 10.1080/146532402761624719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  David Berz; Elise M McCormack; Eric S Winer; Gerald A Colvin; Peter J Quesenberry
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Clinical grade adult stem cell banking.

Authors:  Sreedhar Thirumala; W Scott Goebel; Erik J Woods
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Thawing of Pooled, Solvent/Detergent-Treated Plasma octaplasLG®: Validation Studies Using Different Thawing Devices.

Authors:  Andrea Heger; Katharina Pock; Jürgen Römisch
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  Ripples make waves: binding structured activity and plasticity in hippocampal networks.

Authors:  Josef H L P Sadowski; Matthew W Jones; Jack R Mellor
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Cryopreservation as a Key Element in the Successful Delivery of Cell-Based Therapies-A Review.

Authors:  Julie Meneghel; Peter Kilbride; G John Morris
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-26

6.  Automated dry thawing of cryopreserved haematopoietic cells is not adversely influenced by cryostorage time, patient age or gender.

Authors:  Peter Kilbride; Julie Meneghel; Giovanna Creasey; Fatemeh Masoudzadeh; Tina Drew; Hannah Creasey; David Bloxham; G John Morris; Kevin Jestice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.