Literature DB >> 12568536

Determination of the activity of acidic phytate-degrading enzymes in cereal seeds.

Ralf Greiner1, Ines Egli.   

Abstract

Five different methods were compared to elucidate the total activity of the acidic phytate-degrading enzymes present in the seeds of rye, wheat, and barley. Phytate-degrading activity was studied at pH 5.0 by quantifying the liberated phosphate. Rye showed the highest acid phytate-degrading activity among the cereals studied. Using an aqueous extract, only 30-50% of the activity was found (rye, 3443 mU g(-1) of grain; wheat, 1026 mU g(-1) of grain; barley, 1032 mU g(-1) of grain) compared to that found by the direct incubation of the dry-milled cereal grains in a buffered phytate-containing solution (rye, 6752 mU g(-1) of grain; wheat, 2931 mU g(-1) of grain; barley, 2093 mU g(-1) of grain). Extending the extraction time resulted in an increase in extractable phytate-degrading activity by, at maximum, 10-15%. Extraction of phytate-degrading activity is strongly enhanced in the presence of Triton X-100 and the protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (rye, 6536 mU g(-1) of grain; wheat, 2873 mU g(-1) of grain; barley, 2023 mU g(-1) of grain), suggesting at least a partial association with membrane structures and a degradation by proteolytic activity during extraction. In addition, it was shown that determining phytate-degrading activity by quantification of the liberated inorganic phosphate is more robust and precise than determining phytate-degrading activity by quantification of the residual phytate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12568536     DOI: 10.1021/jf0204405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  7 in total

1.  Phytate degradation in gnotobiotic broiler chickens and effects of dietary supplements of phosphorus, calcium, and phytase.

Authors:  Vera Sommerfeld; Andrew G Van Kessel; Henry L Classen; Margit Schollenberger; Imke Kühn; Markus Rodehutscord
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Effect of supplemental phytase and xylanase in wheat-based diets on prececal phosphorus digestibility and phytate degradation in young turkeys.

Authors:  C-J Ingelmann; M Witzig; J Möhring; M Schollenberger; I Kühn; M Rodehutscord
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Cereal grain fiber composition modifies phosphorus digestibility in grower pigs.

Authors:  Charlotte M E Heyer; Janelle M Fouhse; Thava Vasanthan; Ruurd T Zijlstra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Effect of germination on the phytase activity, phytate and total phosphorus contents of rice (Oryza sativa), maize (Zea mays), millet (Panicum miliaceum), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and wheat (Triticum aestivum).

Authors:  Marshall Arebojie Azeke; Samuel Jacob Egielewa; Mary Ugunushe Eigbogbo; Inegbenose Godwin Ihimire
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  The effect of genotype and traditional food processing methods on in-vitro protein digestibility and micronutrient profile of sorghum cooked products.

Authors:  Dilooshi K Weerasooriya; Scott R Bean; Yohannes Nugusu; Brian P Ioerger; Tesfaye T Tesso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Understanding the Adaptive Mechanisms of Plants to Enhance Phosphorus Use Efficiency on Podzolic Soils in Boreal Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Muhammad Nadeem; Jiaxu Wu; Hamideh Ghaffari; Amana Jemal Kedir; Shamila Saleem; Alain Mollier; Jaswinder Singh; Mumtaz Cheema
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Phytate degradation cascade in pigs as affected by phytase supplementation and rapeseed cake inclusion in corn-soybean meal-based diets.

Authors:  Pia Rosenfelder-Kuon; Nicolas Klein; Benedikt Zegowitz; Margit Schollenberger; Imke Kühn; Lucia Thuringer; Jana Seifert; Markus Rodehutscord
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.