Literature DB >> 12568243

Testosterone suppresses circadian responsiveness to social cues in the diurnal rodent Octodon degus.

Tammy J Jechura1, Jacquelynn M Walsh, Theresa M Lee.   

Abstract

The diurnal, social rodent Octodon degus displays a robust sex difference in the ability to use social cues to facilitate reentrainment following a phase advance of the light cycle. Adult females housed with a female social cue donor reentrained 25% to 40% faster than did females reentraining alone. However, reentrainment rates of males were unaffected by exposure to female social cues during reentrainment. The authors hypothesized that males were less sensitive to the reentrainment-enhancing effects of social cues and that their higher threshold to the stimuli could be overcome if the social cues were either increased in strength or salience. Housing a male with two females significantly shortened the time to reentrain following a 9-h phase advance (p = 0.002). Housing with a sister had no effect on reentrainment. Therefore, male degus are able to respond to social cues but require the stimulus to be stronger than that for females. The effect of testosterone was tested by comparing reentrainment rates of castrated males before and after testosterone replacement both with and without a female social cue donor. Castrated males responded to a single female social cue donor, reentraining 35% faster than when housed alone (p = 0.006), whereas the time to reentrainment of intact males and males with testosterone capsule implants did not differ. Intact females were also implanted with testosterone and phase shifted with and without donors. Testosterone treatment eliminated the increase in reentrainment rates in the presence of social cues. The authors conclude that the rate of recovery from odor-enhanced phase shifts is modulated by activational effects of testosterone in male degus. Testosterone is also effective in suppressing social cue responsiveness in females, suggesting that testosterone's effects on responsiveness are not sexually dimorphic. This hormonal effect likely occurs by altering sensory system functions or CNS response to sensory information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12568243     DOI: 10.1177/0748730402239675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  6 in total

Review 1.  The regulation of neuroendocrine function: Timing is everything.

Authors:  Lance J Kriegsfeld; Rae Silver
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Androgens modulate structure and function of the suprachiasmatic nucleus brain clock.

Authors:  Ilia N Karatsoreos; Matthew P Butler; Joseph Lesauter; Rae Silver
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Social forces can impact the circadian clocks of cohabiting hamsters.

Authors:  Matthew J Paul; Premananda Indic; William J Schwartz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The neuroendocrine control of the circadian system: adolescent chronotype.

Authors:  Megan Hastings Hagenauer; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 5.  Sex differences in daily timekeeping and circadian clock circuits.

Authors:  Deborah A M Joye; Jennifer A Evans
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 7.499

Review 6.  Sex differences in behavioral circadian rhythms in laboratory rodents.

Authors:  Jessica A Krizo; Eric M Mintz
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.