Literature DB >> 12567413

Early use of clinical BRCA1/2 testing: associations with race and breast cancer risk.

Katrina Armstrong1, Barbara Weber, Jill Stopfer, Kathleen Calzone, Mary Putt, James Coyne, J Sanford Schwartz.   

Abstract

When BRCA1/2 testing became commercially available in 1996, many U.S. experts voiced concern about the potential for indiscriminate use of testing among low-risk women. Supporting this concern, several early surveys of interest in genetic testing suggested that genetic testing for cancer susceptibility might appeal most to individuals at low risk of carrying a mutation. To identify factors associated with early use of clinical BRCA1/2 testing, a case-control study was conducted at a large academic health system in the metropolitan Philadelphia region. A total of 167 women underwent genetic counseling for clinical BRCA1/2 testing between 1996 and 1997 (cases) compared with 138 women who were seen in faculty general internal medicine practices over the same period (controls). In this study we measured the risk factors for breast cancer, the risk factors for carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation, and sociodemographic characteristics. Use of BRCA1/2 counseling between 1996 and 1997 was positively associated with family but no personal history of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR), 22.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 9.3-54.3); family and personal history of breast cancer (OR, 150.3; 95% CI, 24.1-939.6); being Caucasian and non-Jewish (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3-13.5); being Caucasian and Jewish (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 2.2-35.5); and being married (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.3). Use of BRCA1/2 counseling was inversely associated with increasing age (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.28 for >60 compared to <50). As suggested by the association with family history, use of counseling was associated with having a higher predicted risk of breast cancer and a higher predicted risk of carrying a BRCA1 mutation (P < 0.0001). Women who sought clinical BRCA1/2 testing in the year after it became commercially available were not the "worried well," but women at significantly increased risk of carrying a mutation. However, even after adjusting for breast cancer risk, there was a substantial racial disparity in use of BRCA1/2 testing. These findings suggest that ensuring equal access to testing for high-risk individuals irrespective of race may be as important for the future of predictive genetic testing as restricting the use of testing among low-risk individuals. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12567413     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  20 in total

1.  Increasing utilization of cancer genetic counseling services using a patient navigator model.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Anna Sukhanova; Jennifer Ellis; Judy Mouchawar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Ashkenazi Jews and breast cancer: the consequences of linking ethnic identity to genetic disease.

Authors:  Sherry I Brandt-Rauf; Victoria H Raveis; Nathan F Drummond; Jill A Conte; Sheila M Rothman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christina D Williams; Alyssa Jasmine Bullard; Meghan O'Leary; Reana Thomas; Thomas S Redding; Karen Goldstein
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-04-08

5.  Who is being referred to cancer genetic counseling? Characteristics of counselees and their referral.

Authors:  E van Riel; S van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-17

6.  Factors associated with psychological distress among women of African descent at high risk for BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Yael R Cukier; Hayley S Thompson; Katarina Sussner; Andrea Forman; Lina Jandorf; Tiffany Edwards; Dana H Bovbjerg; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Inequities in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: implications for public health practice.

Authors:  Ambreen Sayani
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-05-20

8.  Outcomes of a systems-level intervention offering breast cancer risk assessments to low-income underserved women.

Authors:  Darren Mays; McKane E Sharff; Tiffani A DeMarco; Bernice Williams; Beth Beck; Vanessa B Sheppard; Beth N Peshkin; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Social determinants of family health history collection.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Brandon Welch; Cheryl Lynch; Gayenell Magwood; LaShanta Rice; Melanie Jefferson; Jodie Riley
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-08-18

10.  Public trust in genomic risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.