Literature DB >> 12566891

Timolol 0.1% gel (Nyogel 0.1% once daily versus conventional timolol 0.5% solution twice daily: a comparison of efficacy and safety.

Jean-François Rouland1, Patricia Morel-Mandrino, Pierre-Paul Elena, Heinz Polzer, Palaniswamy Sunder Raj.   

Abstract

In a prospective, randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, multi-centre study, 210 patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were enrolled of whom 167 (timolol 0.1% gel 82, timolol 0.5% 85) completed the study as per protocol. The change in intraocular pressure between baseline and week 12 in the worse eye ('at trough') was 6.3 (SD 3.3) mm Hg on timolol 0.1% gel and 7.0 (2.9) mm Hg on timolol 0.5%; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.19). The difference between the two study groups in the change of intraocular pressure from baseline was 0.62 mm Hg; the 90% CI of -0.09 to +1.33 mm Hg was within the pre-specified limits of -1.5 to +1.5 mm Hg demonstrating equivalence between timolol 0.1% gel and timolol 0.5%. The plasma levels of timolol (ng/ml) at 12 weeks in the timolol 0.1% gel group were significantly less than that with timolol 0.5% both before instillation (mean 0.057, SD 0.131 and mean 0.470, SD 0.519 respectively, p = 0.025) and after instillation (mean 0.552, SD 0.992 and mean 2.473, SD 1.780 respectively, p = 0.008). Both treatments were well tolerated with no statistically significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of ocular or systemic adverse events. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12566891     DOI: 10.1159/000067548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  8 in total

1.  Improved systemic safety and risk-benefit ratio of topical 0.1% timolol hydrogel compared with 0.5% timolol aqueous solution in the treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  Hannu Uusitalo; Mika Kähönen; Auli Ropo; Jukka Mäenpää; Gunilla Bjärnhall; Hans Hedenström; Väinö Turjanmaa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  D L Easty; G Nemeth-Wasmer; J-P Vounatsos; B Girard; N Besnainou; P Pouliquen; L Delval; J-F Rouland
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Polymorphisms of genes CYP2D6, ADRB1 and GNAS1 in pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of ophthalmic timolol. A pilot study.

Authors:  Tuomo Nieminen; Hannu Uusitalo; Jukka Mäenpää; Väinö Turjanmaa; Anders Rane; Stefan Lundgren; Auli Ropo; Riikka Rontu; Terho Lehtimäki; Mika Kähönen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Efficacy of Garcinia kola 0.5% Aqueous Eye Drops in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

Authors:  Adebukunola O Adefule-Ositelu; Bernice O Adegbehingbe; Adebayo K Adefule; Olayinka O Adegbehingbe; Elsie Samaila; Kehinde Oladigbolu
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

5.  Evaluation of the role of timolol 0.1% gel in myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hatem E El-Awady; Asaad A Ghanem; Mohamed A Gad
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-30

Review 6.  Timolol 0.1% in Glaucomatous Patients: Efficacy, Tolerance, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Letizia Negri; Antonio Ferreras; Michele Iester
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Consensual Ophthalmotonic Reaction Following Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.

Authors:  Nariman Nassiri; Frank Mei; Hassan Tokko; John Zeiter; Sarah Syeda; Chaesik Kim; Ronald Swendris; Anju Goyal; Elise In'T Veld; Alma Mas-Ramirez; Sonia W Rana; Mark S Juzych; Bret A Hughes
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2022 Jan-Apr

Review 8.  Efficacy and Safety of Topical Timolol Eye Drops in the Treatment of Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaochen Wang; Guiqiu Zhao; Jing Lin; Nan Jiang; Qian Wang; Qiang Xu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.