Literature DB >> 12566197

Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries.

E S Y Chong1, M Mongelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the attitude, knowledge, and expectations of Asian pregnant women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries.
METHODS: Written questionnaires were given to pregnant women attending the National University Hospital antenatal clinics, and 160 responses were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS software.
RESULTS: The participation rate was 65% and 50% of the respondents were Chinese, 20% Indian, 21% Malay, 2% White, and 9.2% Other. The median age was 31 years, and approximately 43% were primiparas. Only 3.7% of them would prefer an elective cesarean delivery, and although 50% had friends or relatives who requested one, only 3% felt that this influenced their preference. The most common reasons for choosing a cesarean delivery were avoiding labor pains and lowering the risk of fetal distress. When asked which modality they would recommend to their friends, only 2% expressed that they would recommend cesarean delivery; however, 71% stated that women should have the right to request a cesarean delivery. Awareness of complications arising from vaginal and cesarean deliveries was generally low and related to the frequency of these complications. There was no significant correlation between demographic characteristics and maternal preference for mode of delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Asian women largely prefer a vaginal delivery, and their attitude toward cesarean delivery on demand is comparable with that of Western women. Cultural or ethnic differences are unlikely to affect maternal preference for cesarean delivery in Singapore women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12566197     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00391-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  23 in total

1.  Awareness and Perceptions of and Attitudes towards Caesarean Delivery among Antenatal.

Authors:  Rk Adageba; Ka Danso; A Adusu-Donkor; F Ankobea-Kokroe
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2008-12

2.  Preference of ghanaian women for vaginal or caesarean delivery postpartum.

Authors:  Ka Danso; Hm Schwandt; Ca Turpin; Jd Seffah; A Samba; Mj Hindin
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2009-03

Review 3.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

4.  Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN14570598].

Authors:  N Nassar; C L Roberts; C H Raynes-Greenow; A Barratt; B Peat
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Turkish women's opinions about cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Rukiye Hobek Akarsu; Salime Mucuk
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Sau-fun Li
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery in first pregnancy?

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Shaker Salarilak
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-04

8.  Effect of mode of delivery on perceived risks of maternal health outcomes among expectant parents: a cohort study in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Li; Tippawan Liabsuetrakul; Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy H Liu; Agustina Mazzoni; Nina Zamberlin; Mercedes Colomar; Olivia H Chang; Lila Arnaud; Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Women's Preferences of Method of Delivery and Influencing Factors.

Authors:  Sema Dereli Yilmaz; Meltem Demirgoz Bal; Nezihe Kizilkaya Beji; Seyfettin Uludag
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 0.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.