Literature DB >> 12565766

Current status of robotics in urologic laparoscopy.

Matthew T Gettman1, Michael L Blute, Reinhard Peschel, Georg Bartsch.   

Abstract

Urology has continuously embraced novel technologies like laparoscopy that reduce patient morbidity yet maintain an excellent standard of care. Because of limitations on maneuverability, operative vision, manual dexterity, and tactile sense, laparoscopy can be more difficult to perform than corresponding tasks in open surgery. To potentially increase clinical applicability of laparoscopy, robots that enhance operative performance have recently been introduced for a variety of laparoscopic procedures such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, pyeloplasty, and even laparoscopic cystectomy and neobladder construction. While these robots have generated excitement and many robotic applications have been described, the benefit of the advanced technology in expanded series of patients remains largely unknown. In addition, the ability of telerobotics to be used by surgeons inexperienced in conventional laparoscopy is also poorly understood. This review compares current features of available robots, advantages and limitations of robots, the emerging clinical applications, and the future potential of robotics in urology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12565766     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00579-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  14 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolong Zhang; Jiajun Yan; Yu Ren; Chong Shen; Xiangrong Ying; Shouhua Pan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 2.  Status of robotic cystectomy in 2005.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Robotic surgery in urology].

Authors:  S Buse; C Gilfrich; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy].

Authors:  A Mottrie; P Schatteman; E Fonteyne; J Rotering; M Stöckle; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Robotic Partial Cystectomy for Primary Urachal Adenocarcinoma of the Urinary Bladder.

Authors:  Katherine James; Nikhil Vasdev; Gowrie Mohan-S; Tim Lane; James M Adshead
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2015-11-10

6.  Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy.

Authors:  Akhil Muthigi; Abhinav Sidana; Arvin K George; Michael Kongnyuy; Mahir Maruf; Subin Valayil; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Cryosurgery, an alternative treatment option for organ-confined prostate cancer: current beliefs and practice patterns of urologists.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Kaitlin E Kosinski; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Anup Kumar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion.

Authors:  R F van Velthoven; T Piechaud
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without robotic assistance.

Authors:  Jonathan E Bernie; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; James Brown; Thomas A Gardner; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.