Literature DB >> 12564553

Saliency of peripheral targets in gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays.

Eyal M Reingold1, Lester C Loschky.   

Abstract

Gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays (GCMRDs) have been proposed to solve the processing and bandwidth bottleneck in many single-user displays, by dynamically placing high-resolution in a window at the center of gaze, with lower resolution everywhere else. The three experiments reported here document aslowing of peripheral target acquisition associated with the presence of a gaze-contingent window. This window effect was shown for displays using either moving video or still images. The window effect was similar across a resolution-defined window condition and a luminance-defined window condition, suggesting that peripheral image degradation is not a prerequisite of this effect. The window effect was also unaffected by the type of window boundary used (sharp or blended). These results are interpreted in terms of an attentional bias resulting in a reduced saliency of peripheral targets due to increased competition from items within the window. We discuss the implications of the window effect for the study of natural scene perception and for human factors research related to GCMRDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12564553     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  7 in total

1.  Where people look when watching movies: do all viewers look at the same place?

Authors:  Robert B Goldstein; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Can changes in eye movement scanning alter the age-related deficit in recognition memory?

Authors:  Jessica P K Chan; Daphne Kamino; Malcolm A Binns; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-12

3.  The effect of target salience and size in visual search within naturalistic scenes under degraded vision.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Adam C Clayden; Robert B Fisher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Microsaccade generation requires a foveal anchor.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Rachel E Langston; Francisco Costela; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 0.957

5.  Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Lester C Loschky; Ryan V Ringer; Aaron P Johnson; Adam M Larson; Mark Neider; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-14

6.  Visual search in naturalistic scenes from foveal to peripheral vision: A comparison between dynamic and static displays.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Teresa Canas-Bajo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  What are the visuo-motor tendencies of omnidirectional scene free-viewing in virtual reality?

Authors:  Erwan Joël David; Pierre Lebranchu; Matthieu Perreira Da Silva; Patrick Le Callet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.