OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility of x-ray technologists, 26 in North America (NA), 24 in Europe (EU), in reliably repositioning patient's osteoarthritic (OA) knees, from computerized measurements of minimum joint space width (JSW) and reproducibility in joint repositioning, during their training for the clinical trial. METHODS: Technologists from 12 NA and 12 EU clinical radiology units received identical training, at one site on each continent, in performing the fluoroscopically assisted semiflexed knee examination and in quality control criteria (QCC) for film acceptance. Subjects recruited were 129 in NA and 70 in EU, with both knees radiographed for some subjects. Each technologist radiographed 5 OA knees and repeated the process on the same knees 2 to 7 days later. Minimum medial JSW was measured at a single center on digitized images with computer software that corrected for radiographic magnification. Technologists' reproducibility in joint repositioning and JSW measurement was determined from the difference between test and retest. RESULTS: In all, only 3/50 technologists failed qualification criteria with a repeat-film JSW difference > 0.50 mm. The mean, standard deviation (SD) of the difference in JSW between test/retest for 146 NA film-pairs of -0.020 (0.16) mm was not statistically different from that in 120 EU film-pairs: -0.001 (0.18) mm. In NA and EU 45% of examinations achieved high quality, i.e., JSW difference between repeat films < 0.1 mm, and 92% achieved excellent to good quality with a difference between repeat films < 0.3 mm. NA and EU technologists' reproducibility was unaffected by subject's sex, age, and degree of JSW loss. Reproducibility in joint reposition for all technologists was excellent. CONCLUSION: Between-continent precision of JSW measurements from all accepted pairs of semiflexed views was excellent to very good and similar to the high technical quality achieved in the authors' original report. The value of training incorporating both test/retest radiographs and film QCC is essential for the high technical quality required for multinational clinical trials.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility of x-ray technologists, 26 in North America (NA), 24 in Europe (EU), in reliably repositioning patient's osteoarthritic (OA) knees, from computerized measurements of minimum joint space width (JSW) and reproducibility in joint repositioning, during their training for the clinical trial. METHODS: Technologists from 12 NA and 12 EU clinical radiology units received identical training, at one site on each continent, in performing the fluoroscopically assisted semiflexed knee examination and in quality control criteria (QCC) for film acceptance. Subjects recruited were 129 in NA and 70 in EU, with both knees radiographed for some subjects. Each technologist radiographed 5 OA knees and repeated the process on the same knees 2 to 7 days later. Minimum medial JSW was measured at a single center on digitized images with computer software that corrected for radiographic magnification. Technologists' reproducibility in joint repositioning and JSW measurement was determined from the difference between test and retest. RESULTS: In all, only 3/50 technologists failed qualification criteria with a repeat-film JSW difference > 0.50 mm. The mean, standard deviation (SD) of the difference in JSW between test/retest for 146 NA film-pairs of -0.020 (0.16) mm was not statistically different from that in 120 EU film-pairs: -0.001 (0.18) mm. In NA and EU 45% of examinations achieved high quality, i.e., JSW difference between repeat films < 0.1 mm, and 92% achieved excellent to good quality with a difference between repeat films < 0.3 mm. NA and EU technologists' reproducibility was unaffected by subject's sex, age, and degree of JSW loss. Reproducibility in joint reposition for all technologists was excellent. CONCLUSION: Between-continent precision of JSW measurements from all accepted pairs of semiflexed views was excellent to very good and similar to the high technical quality achieved in the authors' original report. The value of training incorporating both test/retest radiographs and film QCC is essential for the high technical quality required for multinational clinical trials.
Authors: P Ornetti; K Brandt; M-P Hellio-Le Graverand; M Hochberg; D J Hunter; M Kloppenburg; N Lane; J-F Maillefert; S A Mazzuca; T Spector; G Utard-Wlerick; E Vignon; M Dougados Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: S D Chua; S P Messier; C Legault; M E Lenz; E J-M A Thonar; R F Loeser Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-03-24 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Fazel A Khan; Matthew F Koff; Nicolas O Noiseux; Kathie A Bernhardt; Megan M O'Byrne; Dirk R Larson; Kimberly K Amrami; Kenton R Kaufman Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Sonia M Fabris; Joel Faintuch; Sergio L A Brienze; Gilberto B Brito; Isabela S Sitta; Estevao L P Mendes; Ines C B Fonseca; Ivan Cecconello Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Martin van der Esch; Martijn P M Steultjens; Jaap Harlaar; Josien C van den Noort; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Tim D Spector; Philip G Conaghan; J Christopher Buckland-Wright; Patrick Garnero; Gary A Cline; John F Beary; David J Valent; Joan M Meyer Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-03-24 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Marie-Josée Berthiaume; Gilles Beaudoin; Denis Choquette; Boulos Haraoui; Hyman Tannenbaum; Joan M Meyer; John F Beary; Gary A Cline; Jean-Pierre Pelletier Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-12-30 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Marie-Josée Berthiaume; François Abram; Denis Choquette; Boulos Haraoui; John F Beary; Gary A Cline; Joan M Meyer; Johanne Martel-Pelletier Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.156