BACKGROUND: Wound infections are common and serious surgical complications. Wound perfusion delivers oxygen, inflammatory cells, growth factors, and cytokines to injured tissues. Hypoperfused regions experience low oxygen tensions that do not support adequate oxidative killing or wound healing. Clinicians may fail to recognize clinically important hypovolemia because hemodynamic stability and urine output are maintained after peripheral perfusion is compromised. We tested the hypothesis that supplemental fluid administration during and after elective colon resection increases tissue perfusion and tissue oxygen pressure. METHODS:Fifty-six patients undergoing colon resection were randomly assigned to conservative (8 mL x kg(-1) x h(-1), n = 26) or aggressive (16 to 18 mL x kg(-1) x h(-1), n = 30) fluid management. Anesthetic technique was standardized. We used 60% nitrous oxide in 40% oxygen. During surgery and postanesthetic recovery, subcutaneous oxygen tension (P(sq)O(2)) was measured by using a polarographic sensor implanted subcutaneously into 1 upper arm. Capillary blood flow was evaluated postoperatively with a thermal diffusion system. Data were analyzed with 2-tailed t tests; P value less than.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Hemodynamic and renal responses were similar in the groups. Intraoperative tissue oxygen tension was significantly greater in patients given supplemental fluid: 81 +/- 26 vs 67 +/- 18 mm Hg, P =.03. Postoperative P(sq)O(2) (77 +/- 26 vs 59 +/- 15 mm Hg, P =.009) and capillary blood flow (69 +/- 12 vs 53 +/- 12, P <.001) were also greater in the supplemental fluid patients. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental perioperative fluid administration significantly increases tissue perfusion and tissue oxygen partial pressure. Optimizing tissue perfusion will require providing more fluid than indicated by normal clinical criteria or use of invasive monitoring to guide treatment. The actual effect of supplemental fluid administration on incidence of wound infection requires further investigation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Wound infections are common and serious surgical complications. Wound perfusion delivers oxygen, inflammatory cells, growth factors, and cytokines to injured tissues. Hypoperfused regions experience low oxygen tensions that do not support adequate oxidative killing or wound healing. Clinicians may fail to recognize clinically important hypovolemia because hemodynamic stability and urine output are maintained after peripheral perfusion is compromised. We tested the hypothesis that supplemental fluid administration during and after elective colon resection increases tissue perfusion and tissue oxygen pressure. METHODS: Fifty-six patients undergoing colon resection were randomly assigned to conservative (8 mL x kg(-1) x h(-1), n = 26) or aggressive (16 to 18 mL x kg(-1) x h(-1), n = 30) fluid management. Anesthetic technique was standardized. We used 60% nitrous oxide in 40% oxygen. During surgery and postanesthetic recovery, subcutaneous oxygen tension (P(sq)O(2)) was measured by using a polarographic sensor implanted subcutaneously into 1 upper arm. Capillary blood flow was evaluated postoperatively with a thermal diffusion system. Data were analyzed with 2-tailed t tests; P value less than.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Hemodynamic and renal responses were similar in the groups. Intraoperative tissue oxygen tension was significantly greater in patients given supplemental fluid: 81 +/- 26 vs 67 +/- 18 mm Hg, P =.03. Postoperative P(sq)O(2) (77 +/- 26 vs 59 +/- 15 mm Hg, P =.009) and capillary blood flow (69 +/- 12 vs 53 +/- 12, P <.001) were also greater in the supplemental fluid patients. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental perioperative fluid administration significantly increases tissue perfusion and tissue oxygen partial pressure. Optimizing tissue perfusion will require providing more fluid than indicated by normal clinical criteria or use of invasive monitoring to guide treatment. The actual effect of supplemental fluid administration on incidence of wound infection requires further investigation.
Authors: Barbara Kabon; Angelika Nagele; Dayakar Reddy; Chris Eagon; James W Fleshman; Daniel I Sessler; Andrea Kurz Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Lukas E Brügger; Guido Beldi; Mario Beck; Francesca Porta; Hendrik Bracht; Daniel Candinas; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Peter C Chong; Elisa F Greco; Danielle Stothart; Donna E Maziak; Sudhir Sundaresan; Farid M Shamji; David Neilipovitz; Lauralyn McIntyre; Paul Hébert; Andrew J E Seely Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Florence Grant; Murray F Brennan; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; Michael D'Angelica; Mary E Fischer; Mithat Gonen; Hao Zhang; William R Jarnagin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 12.969