Literature DB >> 12563143

Coronary calcification compared in patients with acute versus in those with chronic coronary events by using dual-sector spiral CT.

Joseph Shemesh1, Sara Apter, Yacov Itzchak, Michael Motro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare underlying calcific atherosclerotic lesions in acute versus chronic coronary events in patients with hypertension by using dual-sector spiral computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred eighty-four calcific lesions were analyzed in a cohort of 50 patients (39 men, 11 women; age range, 55-79 years; mean age, 66 years +/- 6 [SD]) with hypertension who sustained a coronary event during 3-year follow-up. All underwent dual-sector spiral CT within 12 months before the event. Twenty-nine patients had an acute event (acute group): acute myocardial infarction, 20; unstable angina pectoris, six; acute ischemia, two; sudden death, one. Twenty-one patients had chronic manifestations of obstructive coronary disease (chronic group): severe stable angina, five; angiographically identified disease, 12; disease requiring angioplasty, two; and disease requiring bypass surgery, two. To examine differences between the two study groups, the chi(2) or Fisher exact test was applied to categorical parameters and the two-sample t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test to quantitative parameters.
RESULTS: High prevalence of coronary calcium (total coronary calcium score [TCS] >0) was observed in both groups: 93% (27 of 29) in the acute and 95% (20 of 21) in the chronic group. There were 518 lesions in the chronic and 366 in the acute group, with a median number of 35 and nine lesions per patient, respectively (P <.001). The median TCS was 906 for the chronic and 63 for the acute group (P <.01).
CONCLUSION: A mild degree of calcification characterizes patients with acute coronary events, while diffuse high-attenuation calcific plaques are associated with chronic coronary events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12563143     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2262011903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

Review 1.  Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT.

Authors:  Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Myocardial infarction on non-ECG synchronized contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography.

Authors:  Rahul Patel; David Lewis; Theodore J Dubinsky
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-05-18

Review 3.  Does statin therapy affect the progression of atherosclerosis measured by a coronary calcium score?

Authors:  Edward A Gill
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with coronary artery calcium volume versus density.

Authors:  Isac C Thomas; Brandon Shiau; Julie O Denenberg; Robyn L McClelland; Philip Greenland; Ian H de Boer; Bryan R Kestenbaum; Gen-Min Lin; Michael Daniels; Nketi I Forbang; Dena E Rifkin; Jan Hughes-Austin; Matthew A Allison; J Jeffrey Carr; Joachim H Ix; Michael H Criqui
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  An Update on the Utility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring for Coronary Heart Disease and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Sina Kianoush; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica; Priya Umapathi; Garth Graham; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Does coronary calcium scoring with a SCORE better predict significant coronary artery stenosis than without? Correlation with computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Gamze Durhan; Tuncay Hazırolan; Hamza Sunman; Jale Karakaya; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba; Kudret Aytemir; Ergun Karaağaoğlu; Deniz Akata
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Coronary artery calcification in clinical practice: what we have learned and why should it routinely be reported on chest CT?

Authors:  Joseph Shemesh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

8.  The Impact of Rosuvastatin on the Density Score of Coronary Artery Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Rationale and Design of RosCal Study.

Authors:  Wenbin Zhang; Yi Luan; Chongying Jin; Shengjie Xu; Xukun Bi; Yanbo Zhao; Fuyu Qiu; Guosheng Fu; Min Wang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Association of High-Density Calcified 1K Plaque With Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Alexander R van Rosendael; Jagat Narula; Fay Y Lin; Inge J van den Hoogen; Umberto Gianni; Omar Al Hussein Alawamlh; Patricia C Dunham; Jessica M Peña; Sang-Eun Lee; Daniele Andreini; Filippo Cademartiri; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Edoardo Conte; Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Fabian Plank; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Todd C Villines; Harald G Weirich; Subhi J Al'Aref; Lohendran Baskaran; Iksung Cho; Ibrahim Danad; Donghee Han; Ran Heo; Ji Hyun Lee; Asim Rivzi; Wijnand J Stuijfzand; Heidi Gransar; Yao Lu; Ji Min Sung; Hyung-Bok Park; Habib Samady; Peter H Stone; Renu Virmani; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Jeroen J Bax; James K Min; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Associations of Abdominal Muscle Area with 4-Year Change in Coronary Artery Calcium Differ by Ethnicity Among Post-Menopausal Women.

Authors:  Christina L Wassel; Gail A Laughlin; Sarah D Saad; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Wilma Wooten; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.