Literature DB >> 12562483

Efficacy and safety of caudal injection of levobupivacaine, 0.25%, in children under 2 years of age undergoing inguinal hernia repair, circumcision or orchidopexy.

R Taylor1, R Eyres, G A Chalkiadis, S Austin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine is the S(-)-enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine. Evidence suggests that it is less cardiotoxic than racemic bupivacaine and the R(+)-enantiomer, dexbupivacaine, while retaining similar local anaesthetic properties and potency to racemic bupivacaine.
METHODS: This was an open study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of 0.25% levobupivacaine administered as a caudal injection at a dose of 2 mg.kg(-1) to 49 paediatric patients aged less than 2 years old undergoing circumcision (group 1), or hernia repair or orchidopexy (group 2).
RESULTS: Adequate analgesia (an increase of <20% in pulse or respiratory rate compared with baseline and an absence of gross movement on application of surgical stimulus) was achieved in 43/48 patients evaluable for efficacy (89.6%). All 22 patients in the circumcision group had adequate analgesia, and two of these patients did not require additional analgesia. The mean time to the use of additional analgesia was 7.3 h. Only one event (a mild rash) was considered possibly related to study medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine is a promising new local anaesthetic agent for pain management in paediatric patients and appears to offer similar anaesthetic efficacy to racemic bupivacaine with a potentially improved tolerability profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12562483     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review].

Authors:  B Urbanek; S Kapral
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  A Comparison of Three Different Volumes of Levobupivacaine for Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Orchidopexy and Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Vesna Marjanovic; Ivana Budic; Marija Stevic; Dusica Simic
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Evaluation of spinal toxicity and long-term spinal reflex function after intrathecal levobupivaciane in the neonatal rat.

Authors:  Emre Hamurtekin; Bethany L Fitzsimmons; Veronica I Shubayev; Marjorie R Grafe; Ronald Deumens; Tony L Yaksh; Suellen M Walker
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Ultrasound versus anatomical landmarks for caudal epidural anesthesia in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yukako Abukawa; Koichi Hiroki; Nobutada Morioka; Hiroko Iwakiri; Tomoko Fukada; Hideyuki Higuchi; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Comparison between caudal bupivacaine and bupivacaine with ketamine for postoperative analgesia in children: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Depinder Kaur; Saurabh Anand
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Dec

6.  Dorsal Penile Nerve Block via Perineal Approach, an Alternative to a Caudal Block for Pediatric Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaocou Wang; Chaoxuan Dong; Deepti Beekoo; Xiaowei Qian; Jun Li; Wang-Ning Shang-Guan; Xuebin Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nick Zavras; Stella Tsamoudaki; Efstratios Christianakis; Demetrios Schizas; Emmanuel Pikoulis; Helen Kyritsi; George Chrousos
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01

8.  Comparison of 3 different regional block techniques in pediatric patients. A prospective randomized single-blinded study.

Authors:  Levent Sahin; Mahmut H Soydinc; Elzem Sen; Omer Cavus; Mehrican Sahin
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.484

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.